Bible Encyclopedias
Inscriptions

Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature

Search for…

Enter query below:

or

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Prev Entry
Insacrati

Next Entry
Inscriptions, Christian.

Resource Toolbox

Print Article

Additional Links

Concordances
Nave Topical Bible
• Superscription (Inscription)
• Legends (Inscriptions)
• Inscriptions
Dictionaries
Holman Bible Dictionary
• Inscription
Hastings' NT Dictionary
• Inscription
King James Dictionary
• Inscription
1910 New Catholic Dictionary
• Inscriptions
• Inscription of Autun
• Inscription of Abercius
•   (only first 3 shown)
Vines' Expository Dictionary
• Inscription
Webster Dictionary
• Inscriptive
• Inscription
• Inscriptible
Encyclopedias
1911 Encyclopedia Britannica
• Orkhon Inscriptions
• Runic Language and Inscriptions Runes
International Standard Bible Encyclopedia
• Inscription
McClintock and Strong's Bible Encyclopedia
• Autun Inscription
• Inscriptions
• Inscriptions, Christian.
•   (only first 3 shown)
The Catholic Encyclopedia
• Early Christian Inscriptions
• Inscription of Abercius
The Jewish Encyclopedia
• Cuneiform Inscriptions
• Inscriptions, Greek, Hebrew
• Siloam Inscription
Lexicons
• ἐπιγραφή
• ἐπιγράφω
• τίτλος
• כְּתָב
• פִּתוּּחַ

carved on stone have in all ages been regarded by cultivated, and sometimes even by rude nations, as the most enduring monuments of remarkable events. Thus the early patriarch Job would have his dying profession of faith "graven with iron in the rock forever" (Job 19:24). Moses inscribed the law upon stones, and set them up permanently in Mt. Ebal (Deuteronomy 27:2-8; Joshua 8:30). (See PILLAR).

The oldest inscriptions now known to us are the Chinese, which profess to ascend to B.C. 2278. Those of India date only back to B.C. 315, the age of Sandracottus; but it has been thought that the hieroglyphical inscriptions of Central America and of Mexico may prove to be of much older date than those of China even. The Egyptian inscriptions are generally acknowledged to be as old as B.C. 2000; next in order come the Assyrian and Babylonian, reaching nearly as high an antiquity and then follow the Persian, and Median, and Phoenician, ail of about B.C. 700, while the Greek date only to B.C. 500 and 600, and the Etruscan and Roman to no remoter date than the Indian. i.e. B.C. 400-300. The most remarkable of all the known inscriptions are the trilingual inscription of Rosetta, that of Shalmanezer on the obelisk of Nimrud, and the cylinder of Sennacherib; the trilingual inscription of Darius I on the rock at Behistun; the Greek inscription of the soldiers of Psammetichus at Ipsamboul, and of the bronze helmet dedicated by Hiero I to the Olympian Jupiter; the inscription on the coffin of the Cyprian king Asmumazer; the Etruscan inscription called the Eugubine Tables; that of Mummius, the conqueror of Corinth, at Rome, and the will of Augustus at Ancyra; the inscription of the Ethiopian monarch Silco; the old monument of Yu, and the inscription of Se-gan-fu, recording the arrival of Christianity in China (A.D. 631); the inscriptions of. Chandra-gupta and Asoka in India.

I. Egyptian Hieroglyphics. — These are at once the most ancient, the most copious, and the most instructive of all relics of this description extant. The Egyptians used three modes of writing: (1) the Enchorial or Demotic, the common language of the country; (2) the Hieratic, peculiar to the priests; and (3) the Hieroglyphic. Hieroglyphics, again, are of three kinds: (1.) Phonetic, when the hieroglyphic stands for a letter; (2.) Emblematic or Symbulic, when it is an emblem or symbol of the thing represented; (3.) Figurative, when it is a representation of the object itself. The annexed engraving will give some idea of the four different kinds of Egyptian characters; by this it will be seen that in some cases the derivation of the demotic character is to be traced, through its various gradations, from the original pure hieroglyphic, while in others the resemblance is utterly lost. We illustrate this subject by a few examples, pointing out the various meanings attached to the Egyptian characters under different circumstances. The names of the gods were in general expressed by symbols and not by letters; "in the same manner, the Jews never wrote at full length the ineffable name of Jehovah, but always expressed it by a short mark, which they pronounced Adonai." These representations were of two kinds: figurative, in which the name of the deity is implied by the form in which he was represented in his statue, and symbolic, in which a part of the statue, or some object having a reference to the deity, was employed, as for instance:

Dr. Young and Mr. Tattam have satisfactorily shown that all that has come down to us of the language and literature of ancient Egypt is contained in the Coptic, Sahadic, or Upper Country, and the Basmurico-Coptic dialects, and in the enchorial, hieratic, and hieroglyphic inscriptions and MSS.; and it is a point that cannot be too much insisted upon, that a previous knowledge of the Coptic is absolutely necessary to a correct understanding of the hieroglyphics. (See HIEROGLYPHICS).

These inscriptions are found abundantly on the various monuments still remaining in Egypt, especially in the tombs and palaces of the several kings. They are found either alone, as documentary records, e.g. on the obelisks and columns; or oftener in connection with pictorial representations of public or private scenes; very rarely, as in the famous Rosetta Stone, with interlinear translations in the corresponding Egyptian or a foreign language. (See EGYPT).

II. Assyrian Cuneatic. — These characters, like the Egyptian hieroglyphics, are usually inscribed upon slabs containing likewise pictorial delineations of martial, hunting, or other scenes. (See CUNEIFORM). The most noted places where they occur are at Behistun, Khorsobad. Kouvunjik, and Nimrud. See each in its order. All the great halls of the various palaces are surrounded in the interior with sculptured slabs set into the walls, and covered with representations of the great historical events of the reigns of the respective kings, such as battles, sieges of cities, the conquests of provinces, the building of towns, and of mounds for palaces and temples, processions of captives, caravans bearing tribute from subjected nations, or presents from vassal kings, or taxes from the various districts of the empire, etc. Several hundreds of these have been removed, taken down the Euphrates, and shipped to England and France, and set up in the British Museum, and that of the Louvre at Paris. These slabs vary in size from three to seven feet in breadth, and from five to eleven feet in height and a part even reach thirteen and fifteen feet. Some of them have been brought to our own country, and presented to Amherst and other colleges. These slabs become, as it were, leaves in the Assyrian history. Each chamber, in fact, is a volume; for not only do we have the sculptures, but also inscriptions in a cuneiform or wedge-form letter, which furnishes a commentary on,the events represented by the artist.. Great progress has already been made in deciphering this language, as we have stated elsewhere, and we have most wonderful and interesting additions to our knowledge of ancient Nineveh (q.v.).

III. Phoenician Records. — These are very fragmentary and widely scattered. They are in characters closely resembling the old Hebrew. Most of them have been diligently collected and expounded by Gesenius in his Monumenta Phanicia (Lpz. 1837). (See PHOENICIA). A very interesting inscription relating to the history of one of the early Moabitish kings has lately been discovered. (See AINSHA).

Copyright Statement
These files are public domain.