Lectionary Calendar
Thursday, November 21st, 2024
the Week of Proper 28 / Ordinary 33
Attention!
Tired of seeing ads while studying? Now you can enjoy an "Ads Free" version of the site for as little as 10¢ a day and support a great cause!
Click here to learn more!

Bible Encyclopedias
Curious Arts

Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature

Search for…
or
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z
Prev Entry
Curio (2)
Next Entry
Curitan
Resource Toolbox
Additional Links

(τὰ περίεργα, literally the sedulous things, hence the term is applied to an over-officious person, e.g. a "busy-body," 1 Timothy 5:13), prop. overwrought, hence magic (see Iren. adv. Haeres. 1:20; Isidor. iii. 139; comp. curiosus, Horace, Epod. 17:77); spoken of the black art as practiced by the Ephesian conjurors (Acts 19:19; see Kuinol, in loc.). The appropriateness of the term is shown by Deyling (Observatt. Sacr. iii. 277 sq.). The allusion is doubtless to the famous Ephesian spells (Ε᾿φέσια γράμματα ), i.e. charms or scraps of parchment (originating or most used at Ephesus) whereon were written certain marks and formulae, which, like amulets, were worn upon the person as a safeguard against diseases, demons, and other evils (see Wagenseil, Tela Ignea, preface, p. 33; Ursinus, Analect. 2:46; Dietric, Antt. Biblic. in loc.; Cellarins, Disputt. A cadem. p. 441; Wolburg, Observatt. Sacr. p. 470; Laur. Rannires, in Penteconcarch. p. 214). (See DIVINATION). They are frequently referred to in ancient writings (see Wetstein, Kype, etc. in loc.), e.g. Eustathius (ad Hom. Odyss. i, p. 994, 35), "Ephesian letters: some say these were incantations which were of very great assistance to Croesus when used by him at the stake; in the Olympic games, however, it is said that a certain Milesian failed to outstrip an Ephesian till the charm worn by the latter was discovered and removed" (comp. Erasmus, Adagg. Center. 2:578). The phrase appears to have been applied to any talismanic inscription (Kister, ad Suidam, 1:919; Gale, ad Jamblichum, p. 290). Ortlob, however, in his Diss. de Ephesiorum libris conbustis (Lips. 1708), § 9, contends that the arts in question were rather methods of promoting the worship of the patron goddess of the city (see Wolf, Curae, in loc.). The other and usual view is maintained by Siber (Disputatio de περιεργίᾷ Ephesiorum, Vitemb. 1685; also in Thesaur. Dissertationum super N.T. 1:484 sq.), and Schurzfleisch (Dissertat o de libris Ephesiis, Vitemb. 1698). (See EPHESUS).

Bibliography Information
McClintock, John. Strong, James. Entry for 'Curious Arts'. Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature. https://www.studylight.org/​encyclopedias/​eng/​tce/​c/curious-arts.html. Harper & Brothers. New York. 1870.
 
adsfree-icon
Ads FreeProfile