Bible Encyclopedias
Beetle

Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature

Search for…

Enter query below:

or

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Prev Entry
Beeth, William

Next Entry
Beetylion (or Bmetylos)

Resource Toolbox

Print Article

Additional Links

Concordances
Nave Topical Bible
• Beetle
Dictionaries
American Tract Society
• Beetle
Easton's Bible Dictionary
• Beetle
Fausset Bible Dictionary
• Beetle
Hastings' BibleDictionary
• Beetle
King James Dictionary
• Beetle
Morrish Bible Dictionary
• Beetle
Smith Bible Dictionary
• Beetle
Webster Dictionary
• Tapestry Beetle
• Oliath Beetle
• Flea-Beetle
•   (only first 3 shown)
Watson's Theological Dictionary
• Beetle
Encyclopedias
1911 Encyclopedia Britannica
• Beetle
International Standard Bible Encyclopedia
• Beetle
McClintock and Strong's Bible Encyclopedia
• Beetle
The Jewish Encyclopedia
• Beetle
Lexicons
• חַרְגֹּל

( חִרְגֹּל chargol', q. d. "leaper") occurs only in Leviticus 11:22, where it is mentioned as one of four flying creeping things, that go upon all four, which have legs above their feet to leap withal upon the earth, which the Israelites were permitted to eat. The other three are the locust, the bald locust, and the grasshopper, respectively rendered by the Sept. Βροῦχος, ἀττάκη, and ἄκρις, while they translate chargol by ὀφιομάχης (q. d. "serpent-fighter"), which Suidas explains as being a wingless locust (εϊ v δος ἀκρίδος, μὴ ἔχον πτερά ). Pliny (9:29) and Aristotle (Hist. Anim. 9, 6) mention locusts that. are serpent-destroyers. This Hebrews word cannot mean the beetle. No species of scarabaeus was ever used as food by the Jews, or perhaps any other nation. Nor does any known species answer to the generic description given in the preceding verse: "This ye may eat of every winged creeper which goeth upon four (feet); that which hath joints at the upper part of its hind legs, to leap with them upon the earth" (comp. Niebuhr, Descrip. de l'Arabie, Copenhague, 1773, p. 33). Hence it is plain that the chargol is some winged creeper, which has at least four feet, which leaps with its two hind jointed legs, and which we might expect, from the permission, to find actually used as food. This description agrees exactly with the locust-tribe of insects, which are well known to have been eaten by the common people in the East from the earliest times to the present day. This conclusion is also favored by the derivation of the word, which signifies to gallop like the English grasshopper and French sauterelle. Although no known variety of locust answers the above description of Pliny and Aristotle, and, indeed, the existence of any such species is denied by Cuvier (Grandsaque's ed. of Pliny, Par. 1828, p. 451, note), yet a sort of ichneumon locust is found in the genus Truxalis (fierce or cruel), inhabiting Africa and China, and comprehending many species, which hunts and preys upon insects. It is also called the Truxalis nasutus, or long. nosed. May not, then, this winged, leaping, insectivorous locust, and its various species, be "the chargol, after its kind," and the ὀφιομάχης of the Septuagint? or might the name have arisen from the similarity of shape and color, which is striking, between the Truxalis nasutus and the ichneumon; just as the locust generally is, at this time, called cavalette by the Italians, on account of its resemblance in shape to the horse? We know that the ancients indulged in tracing the many resemblances of the several parts of locusts to those of other animals (Bochart, Hieroz. pt. 2, lib. 4, c. 5, p. 475). It may be observed that it is no objection to the former and more probable supposition, that a creature which lives upon other insects should be allowed as food to the Jews, contrary to the general principle of the Mosaic law in regard to birds and quadrupeds, this having been unquestionably the case with regard to many species of fishes coming within the regulation of having "fins and scales," and known to exist in Palestine at the present time— as the perch, carp, barbel, etc. (Kitto's Physical History of Palestine, article Fishes). The fact that the chargol is never made the means of the divine chastisements (for which purpose a locust preying upon insects could scarcely be used), concurs with this speculation. (See LOCUST).

Copyright Statement
These files are public domain.