Ewangelia Łukasza 12:14

Nowe Przymierze Zaremba

Lecz On mu odpowiedział: Człowieku, kto Mnie ustanowił sędzią lub rozjemcą między wami?

Parallel Translations

Biblia Gdańska (1632)
Ale mu on rzekł: Człowiecze! któż mię postanowił sędzią albo dzielcą między wami?

Nowa Biblia Gdańska (2012)
Zaś on mu powiedział: Człowieku, kto mnie ustanowił sędzią, czy rozjemcą według waszego?

Biblia Tysiąclecia
Ale mu on rzekł: Człowiecze! któż mię postanowił sędzią albo dzielcą między wami?

Uwspółcześniona Biblia Gdańska
Lecz on mu odpowiedział: Człowieku, któż mnie ustanowił sędzią albo rozjemcą między wami?

Biblia Brzeska (1563)
Ale on mu odpowiedział: O człowiecze! I któż mię postanowił sędzią abo dzielczym nad wami?

Biblia Warszawska
A On mu rzekł: Człowieku, któż mnie ustanowił sędzią lub rozjemcą nad wami?

Bible Verse Review
  from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge

Man: Luke 5:20, Luke 22:58, Romans 2:1, Romans 2:3, Romans 9:20

who: Exodus 2:14, John 6:15, John 8:11, John 18:35, John 18:36

Reciprocal: Proverbs 26:17 - passeth John 8:15 - I judge Acts 7:27 - Who Acts 24:10 - a judge 1 Corinthians 5:12 - what

Gill's Notes on the Bible

And he said unto him, man,.... Or "friend", as the Ethiopic version renders it; that is, Jesus said to him, as the Syriac, Persic, and Ethiopic versions express it:

who made me a judge, or a divider over you? referring to the words of one of the Hebrews to Moses, when he interposed in a difference, Exodus 2:14 suggesting, that the same might be retorted on him, should he engage in such an affair: the reason why Christ avoided meddling with it, was not because it is unlawful for Christians to concern themselves in arbitrations about civil affairs, and in making up family differences, which is very commendable; but lest by such a step, he should give occasion to them, to conclude he was a temporal king: whereas his kingdom was not of this world, and his business lay not in civil affairs, and the management of them; but in spiritual concerns, in preaching the Gospel, and doing good to the souls of men; wherefore this was out of his province: and besides, it was a matter of covetousness, either in this person, or his brother, or both; which Christ takes an occasion from hence to expose, agreeably to his office; to which may be added, that this man seems to have disturbed Christ in his public work, and was of such a worldly spirit, as to prefer the care of his secular affairs, to the hearing of the word, and the welfare of his immortal soul.

Barnes' Notes on the Bible

Who made me a judge? - It is not my business to settle controversies of this kind. They are to be settled by the magistrate. Jesus came for another purpose - to preach the gospel, and so to bring people to “a willingness to do” right. Civil affairs are to be left to the magistrate. There is no doubt that Jesus “could” have told him what was right in this case, but then it would have been interfering with the proper office of the magistrates; it might have led him into controversy with the Jews; and it was, besides, evidently apart from the proper business of his life. We may remark, also, that the appropriate business of ministers of the gospel is to attend to spiritual concerns. They should have little to do with the temporal matters of the people. If they can “persuade men” who are at variance to be reconciled, it is right; but they have no power to take the place of a magistrate, and to settle contentions in a legal way.

Clarke's Notes on the Bible

Verse Luke 12:14. A judge — Without some judgment given in the case, no division could be made; therefore Jesus added the word judge. PEARCE. A minister of Christ ought not to concern himself with secular affairs, any farther than charity and the order of discipline require it. Our Lord could have decided this difference in a moment; but the example of a perfect disengagement from worldly things was more necessary for the ministers of his Church than that of a charity applying itself to temporal concerns. He who preaches salvation to all should never make himself a party man; otherwise he loses the confidence, and consequently the opportunity of doing good to the party against whom he decides. Better to leave all these things to the civil magistrate, unless where a lawsuit may be prevented, and the matter decided to the satisfaction or acquiescence of both parties.