Lectionary Calendar
Saturday, December 21st, 2024
the Third Week of Advent
Attention!
Tired of seeing ads while studying? Now you can enjoy an "Ads Free" version of the site for as little as 10¢ a day and support a great cause!
Click here to learn more!

Bible Commentaries
Psalms 70

The Expositor's Bible CommentaryThe Expositor's Bible Commentary

Verses 1-5

Psalms 70:1-5

THIS psalm is all but identical with the last verses of Psalms 40:13-17. Some unimportant alterations have been made, principally in the Divine names; but the principle on which they have been made is not obvious. It is scarcely correct to say, with Delitzsch, that the psalm "has been transformed, so as to become Elohistic" for though it twice replaces the name of Jehovah with that of God (Psalms 70:1, Psalms 70:4), it makes the converse change in Psalms 70:5, last clause, by reading Jehovah instead of "God," as in Psalms 40:1-17.

Other changes are of little moment. The principal are in Psalms 70:3 and Psalms 70:5. In the former the vehement wish that the psalmist’s mockers may be paralysed with shame is softened down into a desire that they may be turned back. The two verbs are similar in sound, and the substitution may have been accidental, a slip of memory or a defect in hearing, or it may have been an artistic variation of the original. In Psalms 70:5 a prayer that God will hasten to the psalmist’s help takes the place of an expression of confidence that "Jehovah purposes [good]" to him, and again there is similarity of sound in the two words. This change is like the subtle alteration which a painter might make on his picture by taking out one spot of high light. The gleam of confidence is changed to a call of need, and the tone of the whole psalm is thereby made more plaintive.

Hupfeld holds that this psalm is the original, and Psalms 40:1-17 a composite; but most commentators agree in regarding this as a fragment of that psalm. The cut has not been very cleanly made; for the necessary verb "be pleased" has been left behind, and the symmetry of Psalms 70:1 is destroyed for want of it. The awkward incompleteness of this beginning witnesses that the psalm is a fragment.

Bibliographical Information
Nicoll, William R. "Commentary on Psalms 70". "The Expositor's Bible Commentary". https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng/teb/psalms-70.html.
 
adsfree-icon
Ads FreeProfile