Lectionary Calendar
Thursday, January 23rd, 2025
the Second Week after Epiphany
the Second Week after Epiphany
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
Attention!
For 10¢ a day you can enjoy StudyLight.org ads
free while helping to build churches and support pastors in Uganda.
Click here to learn more!
free while helping to build churches and support pastors in Uganda.
Click here to learn more!
Bible Commentaries
Peake's Commentary on the Bible Peake's Commentary
Copyright Statement
These files are public domain.
Text Courtesy of BibleSupport.com. Used by Permission.
These files are public domain.
Text Courtesy of BibleSupport.com. Used by Permission.
Bibliographical Information
Peake, Arthur. "Commentary on 2 Chronicles 1". "Peake's Commentary on the Bible ". https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng/pfc/2-chronicles-1.html. 1919.
Peake, Arthur. "Commentary on 2 Chronicles 1". "Peake's Commentary on the Bible ". https://www.studylight.org/
Whole Bible (35)Old Testament (1)Individual Books (1)
Verses 1-17
PART III (2 Chronicles 1-9). The History of the Reign of Solomon
2 Chronicles 1:1-13 . Solomon at Gibeon (see notes on 1 Kings 3:4-15).
2 Chronicles 1:1-5 . There is nothing corresponding to these verses in 1 K. excepting the reference to Gibeon in 1 Kings 3:4.
2 Chronicles 1:3 . for there was the tent of meeting: the earlier history makes no mention of this; it was probably inserted by the Chronicler in order to explain away what would to him have appeared unthinkable in a God-fearing king, viz. worshipping at a high place ( bamah) ; cf. Leviticus 17:8 f. The presence in Gibeon of the brazen altar, according to the Chronicler, would also, in his eyes, have justified Solomon in worshipping there; no mention is made, however, in 1 Kings 3:4 of the brazen altar being at Gibeon.
2 Chronicles 1:7-13 . See notes on 1 Kings 3:5-15, upon which this passage is based; the variations are unimportant.
2 Chronicles 1:14-17 . Solomon’ s Wealth (see notes on 1 Kings 10:26-29 and cf. 1 Chronicles 9:25-28).— The position of this section, as compared with the sequence of the history in 1 K., suggests that the source which the Chronicler had before him was not in all respects identical with the present form of 1 K.