Lectionary Calendar
Saturday, July 19th, 2025
the Week of Proper 10 / Ordinary 15
the Week of Proper 10 / Ordinary 15
video advertismenet
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
Attention!
For 10¢ a day you can enjoy StudyLight.org ads
free while helping to build churches and support pastors in Uganda.
Click here to learn more!
free while helping to build churches and support pastors in Uganda.
Click here to learn more!
Bible Commentaries
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers Ellicott's Commentary
Copyright Statement
These files are public domain.
Text Courtesy of BibleSupport.com. Used by Permission.
These files are public domain.
Text Courtesy of BibleSupport.com. Used by Permission.
Bibliographical Information
Ellicott, Charles John. "Commentary on Hosea 3". "Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers". https://studylight.org/commentaries/eng/ebc/hosea-3.html. 1905.
Ellicott, Charles John. "Commentary on Hosea 3". "Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers". https://studylight.org/
Whole Bible (44)Old Testament (1)Individual Books (7)
Introduction
III.
We must assume some interval to have elapsed since the events of Hoseaâs domestic life, detailed in Hosea 1:0. Meanwhile the immoralities of Gomer have continued. She at length abandons the home of her lawful husband, and cohabits with one of her lovers. At this point comes the Divine injunction to the prophet.
Verse 1
(1) Adulteress.âThe woman described here is the daughter of Diblaimâbeloved of her friend; better rendered, loved by another. This is preferable to the LXX., âa lover of evil,â which is based on a different reading of the same original text. Gomer is now the concubine slave of anotherâpossibly in poor and destitute condition. And yet the prophetâs love for her is like Jehovahâs love for âthe children of Israel, even when they are turned to other gods, and love grape-cakesââthe luscious sacrificial cakes used in idolatrous worship: a term generally descriptive of the licentious accompaniments of the Ashtoreth worship. (Comp. Jeremiah 7:18.)
Verse 2
(2) Pieces of silver.âShekels.
So I bought her.âGomer was treated as no longer a wife, but requiring to be restored to such a position. The purchase of wives is still a very common practice in the East (See Hendersonâs Commentary, and Deut. xxi 14.)
Half homer of barley.âHalf a homer is the translation given to the Hebrew word lethekh, which occurs only in this passage. This rendering is founded on the interpretation half a cor (cor = homer), which is given in all the Greek versions except the LXX. The latter read âand a nébhel of wine,â the nébhel being probably a skin bottle of a certain liquid capacity. This pre-supposes a different Hebrew text. From 2 Kings 7:1 we may infer that an ephah of barley at ordinary times would cost one shekel (comp. Amos 8:5), and since a homer contains ten ephahs, the price paid by the prophet was thirty shekels altogether. Reckoning a shekel as = two drachms (so LXX.), or 2s. 6 d., the price paid by Hosea was about £3 15s. According to Exodus 21:32, this was the compensation enacted for a slave gored to death by a bull, and is a hint of the degradation to which Gomer had sunk.
Verse 3
(3) Shalt abide for meâi.e., shalt abide in seclusion at my discretion. The âmany daysâ are an indefinite period of amendment, while watchful care was being exercised over her. During this time she is to withdraw herself from her paramour and also from her husband.
Will I also be for thee.âBetter, to thee: i.e., I will have no intercourse with thee. So Aben Ezra, Kimchi, and others. That this was only to be a temporary discipline is evident from Hosea 3:4 and Hosea 6:0.
Verse 4
(4) The prophet suddenly passes from his personal history to that of Israel, which it symbolised.
Without a king . . .âThe isolation of Gomerâs position pre-figured that of Israel in the exile. Her bitter experience was a parable of Israelâs utter deprivation of all civil and religious privilege. There was to be no king, or prince, or sacred ritual of any kind. Observe that the terms of both cultus are here intermingled, suggesting the idolatrous conceptions of the pure ancient practice which Jeroboamâs calf-worship was only too likely to introduce. By âimageâ we are to understand upright stones, representing Baal or the sun-god. (Comp. Hosea 10:1 and Exodus 24:4.) On âephod,â see Judges 17:5; Judges 18:14; Judges 18:17-20; on âteraphim,â Genesis 31:19-35; 1 Samuel 19:13-16; Ezekiel 21:21; Zechariah 10:2. In the last two passages the word is translated âidols,â âimages,â their use as instruments of divination being condemned.
Verse 5
(5) David their king.âMeaning the predicted representative of the Davidic dynasty. Thus Rehoboam and his house are spoken of as âDavidâ (1 Kings 12:16). The phrase âlatter daysâ is used indefinitely of the distant future, the horizon of the seerâs gaze. It occurs in Genesis 49:1 (Authorised version, âlast daysâ). We can only see the fulfilment of this anticipation in the Messianic reign. (Comp. Ezekiel 34:23; Ezekiel 37:24.)