Księga Daniela 6:5

Nowa Biblia Gdańska

Dlatego owi mężowie powiedzieli: Nie znajdziemy przeciwko Danielowi żadnej sprawy; chyba, że znajdziemy coś przeciw niemu w Prawie jego Boga.

Parallel Translations

Biblia Brzeska (1563)
Rzekli tedy mężowie oni: Nigdy przeciw temu Danielowi przyczyny nie znajdziemy, jesliż jej nie poszukamy w zakonie Boga jego.

Biblia Gdańska (1632)
Przetoż rzekli oni mężowie: Nie znajdziemy przeciwko temu Danijelowi żadnej przyczyny, chyba żebyśmy co znaleźli przeciwko niemu w zakonie Boga jego.

Nowe Przymierze Zaremba
(6:6) Przeciwnicy Daniela doszli więc do wniosku: Nie znajdziemy u niego powodu do skargi, chyba że wpadniemy na coś, co łączy się z prawem jego Boga.

Biblia Tysiąclecia
Przetoż rzekli oni mężowie: Nie znajdziemy przeciwko temu Danijelowi żadnej przyczyny, chyba żebyśmy co znaleźli przeciwko niemu w zakonie Boga jego.

Uwspółcześniona Biblia Gdańska
Dlatego ci mężczyźni powiedzieli: Nie znajdziemy przeciwko temu Danielowi żadnego powodu do oskarżenia, chyba że znajdziemy coś przeciwko niemu w prawie jego Boga.

Biblia Warszawska
Satrapowie zaś i ministrowie szukali w sprawach państwowych pozoru do skargi przeciwko Danielowi, lecz nie mogli znaleźć pozoru do skargi ani winy, gdyż był godny zaufania i nie stwierdzono u niego żadnego zaniedbania ani winy.

Bible Verse Review
  from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge

1 Samuel 24:17, Esther 3:8, John 19:6, John 19:7, Acts 24:13-16, Acts 24:20, Acts 24:21

Reciprocal: Genesis 47:16 - Give your cattle 1 Samuel 18:15 - wisely 1 Samuel 29:3 - found Nehemiah 6:13 - that Psalms 27:11 - mine enemies Psalms 35:20 - but Psalms 64:6 - search Jeremiah 29:7 - seek Matthew 26:60 - found none Mark 7:2 - they found Acts 23:20 - as

Gill's Notes on the Bible

Then said these men,.... To one another:

we shall not find any occasion against this Daniel; whom they speak of with great disdain and contempt, calling him this Daniel, this fellow, though in the highest post in the kingdom:

except we find it against him concerning the law of his God; about his religion; not that they thought he would be prevailed upon to break the law of his God in any respect; but they knew he was tenacious of the Jewish religion, and of all the laws, rites, and ceremonies of it; if therefore they could get an act passed, and signed by the king, which would any ways affect his religion, or any branch of it, or prohibit the performance of it for any time, they hoped to get an advantage of him, knowing that he would not on any consideration forsake or neglect that; which being said by his enemies was greatly to his honour.

Barnes' Notes on the Bible

We shall not find any occasion ... - We shall not find any pretext or any cause by which he may be humbled and degraded. They were satisfied of his integrity, and they saw it was vain to hope to accomplish their purposes by any attack on his moral character, or any charge against him in respect to the manner in which he had discharged the duties of his office.

Except we find it against him concerning the law of his God - Unless it be in respect to his religion; unless we can so construe his known conscientiousness in regard to his religion as to make that a proof of his unwillingness to obey the king. It occurred to them that such was his well-understood faithfulness in his religious duties, and his conscientiousness, that they might expect that, whatever should occur, he would be found true to his God, and that this might be a basis of calculation in any measure they might propose for his downfall. His habits seem to have been well understood, and his character was so fixed that they could proceed on this as a settled matter in their plans against him. The only question was, how to construe his conduct in this respect as criminal, or how to make the king listen to any accusation against him on this account, for his religious views were well known when he was appointed to office; the worship of the God of Daniel was not prohibited by the laws of the realm, and it would not be easy to procure a law directly and avowedly prohibiting that.

It is not probable that the king would have consented to pass such a law directly proposed - a law which would have been so likely to produce disturbance, and when no plausible ground could have been alleged for it. There was another method, however, which suggested itself to these crafty counselors - which was, while they did not seem to aim absolutely and directly to have that worship prohibited, to approach the king with a proposal that would be flattering to his vanity, and that, perhaps, might be suggested as a test question, showing the degree of esteem in which he was held in the empire, and the willingness of his subjects to obey him. By proposing a law that, for a limited period, no one should be allowed to present a petition of any kind to anyone except to the king himself, the object would be accomplished. A vain monarch could be prevailed on to pass such a law, and this could be represented to him as a measure not improper in order to test his subjects as to their willingness to show him respect and obedience; and at the same time it would be certain to effect the purpose against Daniel - for they had no doubt that he would adhere steadfastly to the principles of his religion, and to his well-known habits of worship. This plan was, therefore, crafty in the extreme, and was the highest tribute that could be paid to Daniel. It would be well if the religious character and the fixed habits of all who profess religion were so well understood that it was absolutely certain that no accusation could lie against them on any other ground, but that their adherence to their religious principles could be calculated on as a basis of action, whatever might be the consequences.