the Week of Proper 28 / Ordinary 33
Click here to join the effort!
Bible Encyclopedias
Tongues, Gift of
International Standard Bible Encyclopedia
or 1. Basic Character of 1 Corinthians 14 :
A spiritual gift mentioned in Acts 10:44-46; Acts 11:15; Acts 19:6; Mark 16:17 , and described in Acts 2:1-13 and at length in 1 Cor 12 through 14, especially chapter 14. In fact, 1 Cor 14 contains such a full and clear account that this passage is basic. The speaker in a tongue addressed God ( 1 Corinthians 14:2 , 1 Corinthians 14:28 ) in prayer (1 Corinthians 14:14 ), principally in the prayer of thanksgiving (1 Corinthians 14:15-17 ). The words so uttered were incomprehensible to the congregation (1 Corinthians 14:2 , 1 Corinthians 14:5 , 1 Corinthians 14:9 , etc.), and even to the speaker himself (1 Corinthians 14:14 ). Edification, indeed, was gained by the speaker (1 Corinthians 14:4 ), but this was the edification of emotional experience only (1 Corinthians 14:14 ). The words were spoken "in the spirit" (1 Corinthians 14:2 ); i.e. the ordinary faculties were suspended and the divine, specifically Christian, element in the man took control, so that a condition of ecstasy was produced. This immediate (mystical) contact with the divine enabled the utterance of "mysteries" (1 Corinthians 14:2 ) - things hidden from the ordinary human understanding (see MYSTERY ). In order to make the utterances comprehensible to the congregation, the services of an "interpreter" were needed. Such a man was one who had received from God a special gift as extraordinary as the gifts of miracles, healings, or the tongues themselves (1 Corinthians 12:10 , 1 Corinthians 12:30 ); i.e. the ability to interpret did not rest at all on natural knowledge, and acquisition of it might be given in answer to prayer (1 Corinthians 14:13 ). Those who had this gift were known, and Paul allowed the public exercise of "tongues" only when one of the interpreters was present (1 Corinthians 14:28 ). As the presence of an interpreter was determined before anyone spoke, and as there was to be only one interpreter for the "two or three" speakers (1 Corinthians 14:28 ), any interpreter must have been competent to explain any tongue. But different interpreters did not always agree (1 Corinthians 14:26 ), whence the limitation to one .
2. Foreign Languages Barred out:
These characteristics of an interpreter make it clear that "speaking in a tongue" at Corinth was not normally felt to be speaking in a foreign language. In 1 Corinthians 14:10 English Versions of the Bible are misleading with "there are, it may be, so many kinds of voices in the world," which suggests that Paul is referring directly to the tongues. But
3. A S tate of Ecstasy:
A complete explanation of the tongues is given by the phenomena of ecstatic utterances, especially when taken in connection with the history of New Testament times. In ecstasy the soul feels itself so suffused with the divine that the man is drawn above all natural modes of perception (the understanding becomes "unfruitful"), and the religious nature alone is felt to be active. Utterances at such times naturally become altogether abnormal. If the words remain coherent, the speaker may profess to be uttering revelations, or to be the mere organ of the divine voice. Very frequently, however, what is said is quite incomprehensible, although the speaker seems to be endeavoring to convey something. In a still more extreme case the voice will be inarticulate, uttering only groans or outcries. At the termination of the experience the subject is generally unconscious of all that has transpired.
For the state, compare Philo, Quis rerum. divin ., li-liii. 249-66: "The best (ecstasy) of all is a divinely-infused rapture and 'mania,' to which the race of the prophets is subject.... The wise man is a sounding instrument of God's voice, being struck and played upon invisibly by Him.... As long as our mind still shines (is active)...we are not possessed (by God)...but ... when the divine light shines, the human light sets.... The prophet ... is passive, and another (God) makes use of his vocal organs." Compare, further, the descriptions of Celsus (Origen, Contra Celsus , vii. 9), who describes the Christian "prophets" of his day as preaching as if God or Christ were speaking through them, closing their words with "strange, fanatical, and quite unintelligible words of which no rational person can find the meaning." The Greek papyri furnish us with an abundance of magical formulas couched in unintelligible terms (e.g. Pap. Lond ., 121, "
Interpretation of the utterances in such a state would always be difficult and diversities of interpretation would be unavoidable. Still, with a fixed content, such as the Christian religion gave, and with the aid of gestures, etc., men who felt that they had an understanding of such conditions could undertake to explain them to the congregation. It is to be noted, however, that Paul apparently does not feel that the gift of interpretation is much to be relied on, for otherwise he would have appraised the utility of tongues more highly than he does. But the popularity of tongues in Corinth is easily understood. The speaker was felt to be taken into the closest of unions with God and hence, to be an especial object of God's favor. Indeed, the occurrence of the phenomenon in a neo-convert was irrefragable proof that the conversion was approved by God (Acts 10:44-48; Acts 11:15; Acts 19:6 ). So in Mark 16:17 the gift is treated as an exceptional and miraculous divine blessing (in this verse "new" is textually uncertain, and the meaning of the word, if read, is uncertain also). Moreover, for the more selfish, the gift was very showy ( 1 Corinthians 13:1 suggests that it was vociferous), and its possession gratified any desire for personal prominence.
4. The Account in Acts 2 :
The account in Acts 2 differs from that of 1 Corinthians 14 in making the tongues foreign languages, although the ability to use such languages is not said to have become a permanent apostolic endowment. (Nor is it said that the speech of Acts 2:14-36 was delivered in more than one language.) When the descent of the Spirit occurred, those who were assembled together were seized with ecstasy and uttered praises to God. A crowd gathered and various persons recognized words and phrases in their own tongues; nothing more than this is said. That the occasion was one where a miracle would have had unusual evidential value is evident, and those who see a pure miracle in the account have ample justification for their position. But no more than a providential control of natural forces need be postulated, for similar phenomena are abundantly evidenced in the history of religious experience. At times of intense emotional stress the memory acquires abnormal power, and persons may repeat words and even long passages in a foreign language, although they may have heard them only once. Now the situation at Jerusalem at the time of the Feast gave exactly the conditions needed, for then there were gathered pilgrims from all countries, who recited in public liturgical passages (especially the
5. Religious Emotionalism:
Paul's treatment of the tongues in 1 Corinthians 12 through 14 is a classical passage for the evaluation of religious emotionalism. Tongues are a divine gift, the exercise is not to be forbidden ( 1 Corinthians 14:39 ), and Paul himself is grateful that he has the gift in an uncommon degree (1 Corinthians 14:18 ). Indeed, to those who treat them simply with scorn they become a "sign" that hardening is taking place (1 Corinthians 14:21-23 ). Yet a love of them because they are showy is simply childish (1 Corinthians 14:20; 1 Corinthians 13:11 ), and the possessor of the gift is not to think that he has the only thing worth obtaining (1 Cor 12). The only gift that is utterly indispensable is love (1 Corinthians 13:1-13 ), and without it tongues are mere noise (1 Corinthians 13:1 ). The public evidential value of tongues, on which perhaps the Corinthians were inclined to lay stress, Paul rates very low (1 Corinthians 14:21-23 ). Indeed, when exercised in public they tend to promote only the self-glorification of the speaker (1 Corinthians 14:4 ), and so are forbidden when there is not an interpreter, and they are limited for public use at all times (1 Corinthians 14:27 , 1 Corinthians 14:28 ). But the ideal place for their exercise is in private: "Let him speak to himself, and to God" (1 Corinthians 14:28 ). The applicability of all this to modern conditions needs no commentary. Ultra-emotionalistic outbreaks still cause the formation of eccentric sects among us, and every evangelist knows well-meaning but slightly weak individuals who make themselves a nuisance. On the other hand, a purely intellectual and ethical religion is rather a dreary thing. A man who has never allowed his religious emotions to carry him away may well be in a high state of grace - but he has missed something, and something of very great value. See also SPIRITUAL GIFTS; TONGUES OF FIRE .
Literature.
Plumptre in
These files are public domain and were generously provided by the folks at WordSearch Software.
Orr, James, M.A., D.D. General Editor. Entry for 'Tongues, Gift of'. International Standard Bible Encyclopedia. https://www.studylight.org/encyclopedias/eng/isb/t/tongues-gift-of.html. 1915.
