the Third Week of Advent
Click here to join the effort!
Bible Encyclopedias
Church Government
International Standard Bible Encyclopedia
or I. Approach to the Subject
1. The General Sense
2. The Local Sense
II. Internal Order
1. Subjects of Admission
2. Definite Organizations
3. Ministers
(1) General
(2) Local
4. Ecclesiastical Functions
(1) Control of Membership
(2) Selection of Officers, etc.
(3) Observations of Ordinances
5. Independent (Autonomous) Organizations
III. External Authority
IV. Cooperative Relations
Literature
The object here sought is to discover what kind of church government is mirrored in the New Testament. To do this with perfect definiteness is, no doubt, quite impossible. Certain general features, however, may clearly be seen.
I. Approach to the Subject
The subject is best approached through the Greek word
1. The General Sense
Christ is "head over all things to the church, which is his body ...." (Ephesians 1:22 ); "the general assembly and church of the firstborn who are enrolled in heaven" (Hebrews 12:23 ). Here we have "church" in the broadest sense, including all the redeemed in earth and heaven, and in all ages (see also Ephesians 1:22; Ephesians 3:10; Ephesians 5:22-27; Colossians 1:24; Hebrews 12:23 ).
2. The Local Sense
Here the Scripture passages are very numerous. In some cases, the word is used in the singular, and in others the plural; in some it is used with reference to a specified church, and in others without such specification. In all cases the sense is local.
In Acts 11:26 , it is said that Paul and Barnabas were "gathered together with the church," where the church at Antioch is meant. In Acts 14:23 , Paul and Barnabas are said to have "appointed elders in every church," that is, churches which they had planted. In Rev 2 and 3 the seven churches of Asia Minor are addressed. In Acts 16:5 we are told that the churches "were strengthened in the faith." On the local sense see, further, Acts 8:1; Acts 15:4; Acts 16:5; Acts 20:17; Romans 16:4; 1 Cor 12; 1 Corinthians 6:4; 1 Corinthians 11:16; Galatians 1:2 , Galatians 1:22 , and many other places.
There are a few passages that do not seem exactly to fit into either of the above categories. Such, for example, are Matthew 18:17 and 1 Corinthians 12:28 , where it seems best to understand a generic sense. Such, also, are passages like Acts 9:31 , and 1 Corinthians 10:32 , where a collective sense best suits the cases.
Church government in the New Testament applies only to the local bodies.
II. Internal Order
With respect to the constitution and life of these New Testament churches, several points may be made out beyond reasonable doubt.
1. Subjects of Admission
They were composed of persons who professed faith in Christ, and who were believed to have been regenerated, and who had been baptized. See Acts 2:41 , Acts 2:44 , Acts 2:47 (the Revised Version (British and American) "added to them"); Acts 8:12; Romans 1:8; Romans 6:4; Romans 10:9 , Romans 10:10; 1 Corinthians 1:2; Colossians 1:2 , Colossians 1:4; 1 Timothy 6:12 , and others, where they are called "saints," "sons of God," "faithful brethren," "sanctified in Christ Jesus."
2. Definite Organizations
They are definitely and permanently organized bodies, and not temporary and loose aggregations of individuals. It is quite impossible, for example, to regard the church at Antioch as a loose aggregation of people for a passing purpose. The letters of Paul to the churches at Rome, Corinth, Philippi, Thessalonica, cannot be regarded as addressed to other than permanent and definitely organized bodies.
3. Ministers
They were served by two classes of ministers - one general, the other local.
(1) General
At the head of these is the "apostle" (1 Corinthians 12:28; Ephesians 4:11 ). His official relation to the churches was general. He did not necessarily belong to the group of the original Eleven. Besides Matthias (Acts 1:26 ), Paul and Barnabas (1 Corinthians 9:5 , 1 Corinthians 9:6 ), James, the Lord's brother (Galatians 1:19 ), Andronicus and Junias (Romans 16:7 ) are reckoned as "apostles." The one invariable and necessary qualification of an apostle was that he should have seen the Lord after the Resurrection (Acts 1:22; 1 Corinthians 9:1 ). Another qualification was to have wrought "the signs of an apostle" (2 Corinthians 12:12; compare 1 Corinthians 9:2 ). He was to bear witness to what he had seen and heard, to preach the gospel of the kingdom (Acts 1:8; 1 Corinthians 1:17 ), to found churches and have a general care of them (2 Corinthians 11:28 ). From the nature of his chief qualification, his office was temporary.
Next comes the "prophet." His relation to the churches, also, was general. It was not necessary that he should have seen the Lord, but it appertained to his spiritual function that he should have revelations (Ephesians 3:5 ). There is no indication that his office was in any sense administrative.
After the "prophet" come the "evangelist" and "teacher," the first, a traveling preacher, the second, one who had special aptitude for giving instruction.
After the "teacher" and "evangelist" follow a group of special gifts of "healing," "helps," "governments," "tongues." It may be that "helps" and "governments" are to be identified with "deacons" and "bishops," to be spoken of later. The other items in this part of Paul's list seem to refer to special
(2) Local
There were two clearly distinct offices of a local and permanent kind in the New Testament churches. Paul (Philippians 1:1 ) addresses "all the saints in Christ Jesus that are at Philippi, with the bishops and deacons." See BISHOP;
The most common designation of the first of these officers is "elder" (πρεσβύτερος ,
The function of the elders was, in general, spiritual, but involved an oversight of all the affairs of the church (1 Timothy 3:2; 1 Timothy 5:17 ).
As to the second of the local church officers, it has to be said that little is given us in the New Testament. That the office of deacon originated with the appointment of the Seven in Acts 6:1-15 is not certain. If we compare the qualifications there given by the apostles with those given by Paul in 1 Timothy 3:8-13 , it seems quite probable that the necessity which arose at Jerusalem, and which led to the appointment of the Seven was really the occasion for originating the office of deacon in the churches. The work assigned the Seven was secular, that is to say, the "service of tables." They were to relieve the apostles of that part of the work. A similar relation to the work of the elders seems to have been borne by that of the deacons.
Again, they exercised the highest ecclesiastical functions.
4. Ecclesiastical Functions
(1) Control of Membership
In Matthew 18:17 , our Lord, by anticipation, lodges final action, in the sphere of church discipline, with the church. When the church has taken action, the matter is ended. There is no direction to take it to a higher court. In the church at Corinth, there was a man who was guilty of an infamous offense against purity. With regard to the case, Paul urged the most summary discipline (1 Corinthians 5:5 ). If the church should act upon the judgment which he communicated to them, they would act when "gathered together"; that is to say, action would be taken in conference of the church. In 2 Cor 2, a reference to the case shows that they had acted upon his advice, and that the action was taken by the majority ("the many," the more, 2 Corinthians 2:6 ). In 2 Cor 2 he counsels restoration of this excluded member now repentant. Exclusion and restoration of members were to be effected by a church. This, of course, carried with it the reception of members in the first instance.
(2) Selection of Officers, Etc
This was true in case of the Seven (Acts 6:3-13; see other cases in Acts 15:22; 1 Corinthians 16:3; 2 Corinthians 8:1; Philippians 2:25 ). Acts 14:23 and Titus 1:5 seem, at first, to offset the passages just given. In one of these, Paul and Barnabas are said to have "appointed" ( χειροτονήσαντες ,
(3) Observation of Ordinances
Paul gives direction (1 Corinthians 11:20-34 ) to the church at Corinth about the observance of the Lord's Supper. These directions are given, not to any officer or set of officers, but to the church. Ecclesiastically, of course, the two ordinances are on the same level; and, if one of them had been committed to the custody, so to say, of the churches, so must the other.
5. Independent (Autonomous) Organizations
The management of their business was in their own hands. Paul wrote the church at Corinth: "Let all things be done decently and in order" (1 Corinthians 14:40 ). In that comprehensive injunction, given to a church, is implied control of its affairs by the church.
III. External Authority
The investigation up to this point places us in position to see that there is in the New Testament no warrant for ecclesiastical grades in the ministry of the churches, by which there may be created an ascending series of rulers who shall govern the churches merged into one vast ecclesiastical organization called "the church." So, also, we are in position to see that there is no warrant for an ascending series of courts which may review any "case" that originates in a local church. We may see, on the contrary, that to each local church has been committed by Christ the management of its own affairs; and that He had endowed every such church with ecclesiastical competency to perform every function that any ecclesiastical body has a right to perform.
As the churches are not to be dominated by any external ecclesiastical authority, so they are not to be interfered with, in their church life, by civil government. Jesus taught that Christians should be good citizens (Matthew 22:15-22 ); so did the apostles (Romans 13:1-7; 1 Peter 2:13-16 ). Jesus also taught the spirituality of His Kingdom: "My kingdom is not of this world" (John 18:36 ). It follows that only where the life of a church touched the civic life of the community has the civil authority any right to interfere.
IV. Cooperative Relations
While each local church, according to the New Testament, is independent of every other in the sense that no other has jurisdiction over it, yet coöperative relations were entered into by New Testament churches. Examples and indications of that may be found in Romans 15:26 , Romans 15:27; 2 Cor 8; 2 Corinthians 9:1-15; Galatians 2:10; Romans 15:1; 3 John 1:8 . The principle of coöperation effective in those cases is susceptible of indefinite expansion. Churches may properly coöperate in matters of discipline, by seeking and giving counsel, and by respecting each other's disciplinary measures. In the great, paramount business of evangelizing and teaching the nations, they may coöperate in a multitude of ways. There is no sphere of general Christian activity in which the churches may not voluntarily and freely coöperate for the betterment of the world, the salvation of humanity.
For other standpoints see BISHOP; GOVERNMENT; MINISTRY , etc.
Literature
Hort, The Christian Ecclesia; Hatch, Organization of the Early Christian Churches; Whitley, Church , Ministry and Sacraments in the New Testament; Lindsay, The Church and the Ministry in the Early Cents .; French, Synonyms of New Testament; Vitringa, De Synagoga Vetere; Holzinger, ZAW; Schürer, History of the Jewish People in the Time of Jesus Christ , II; Driver, Introduction to the Literature of the Old Testament; Thayer, New Testament Lexicon , and Cremer, Biblical Theol. Lexicon , under the word, "
These files are public domain and were generously provided by the folks at WordSearch Software.
Orr, James, M.A., D.D. General Editor. Entry for 'Church Government'. International Standard Bible Encyclopedia. https://www.studylight.org/encyclopedias/eng/isb/c/church-government.html. 1915.
