Lectionary Calendar
Sunday, December 22nd, 2024
the Fourth Week of Advent
Attention!
StudyLight.org has pledged to help build churches in Uganda. Help us with that pledge and support pastors in the heart of Africa.
Click here to join the effort!

Bible Dictionaries
Ungodliness

Hastings' Dictionary of the New Testament

Search for…
or
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z
Prev Entry
Undressed Cloth
Next Entry
Union
Resource Toolbox
Additional Links

(ἀσέβεια; the verb is ἀσεβέω and the adj. ἀσεβής)

ἀσέβεια is the religious designation and estimate of impious and immoral conduct (Cremer, Bibl.-Theol. Lexicon of NT Greek, p. 523); cf. Romans 1:18, where it stands side by side with ἀδικία. It appears also in Romans 9:26, where it is in the plural in an OT quotation translating פְשָׁצִים. Elsewhere it occurs only in the Pastoral Epistles (2 Timothy 2:16, Titus 2:12) and Jude (Judges 1:15). The verb ἀσεβέω occurs only in 2 Peter 2:6, Judges 1:15; ἀσεβής is more frequent: Romans 4:5-6 (opp. δίκαιος) 5:6, 8 (synonymous with ἁμαρτωλός), 1 Timothy 1:9; 1 Peter 4:18, Judges 1:15 (joined with ἀμαρτωλός); also in 2 Peter 2:5; 2 Peter 3:7, Judges 1:4.

Cremer remarks interestingly on the rare use of ἀσεβέω and the comparatively rare use of the whole group in the NT: ‘Generally the negative and strong terms ἀδικεῖν, ἀσεβεῖν, ἀνόσια ποιεῖν, which occur often in profane Greek, are met with in Scripture far more rarely than the positive ἀμαρτάνειν, … which in profane Greek was far less morally, and still less religiously, estimated. Herein is manifest, on the one hand, the far deeper religious view of Scripture, which estimates “failings,” or sins of omission, so seriously, and, on the other, its deeper humanity, which does not resort to the strongest terms to designate whatever is actually sinful’ (op. cit., p. 524).

It is an interesting point in NT criticism that the ἀσεβής group is not confined, like the opposed εὐσεβής group, practically to the Pastoral Epistles and 2 Peter. As we have seen, St. Paul uses ἀσεβής and ἀσέβεια not infrequently in Romans. This furnishes an argument to those who maintain the Pauline authorship of the Pastoral Epistles. In opposition to the argument that the use of the word εὐσέβεια, etc., in the Pastorals to express practical religion, both as faith and morals within the sphere of the Church, is un-Pauline and represents a stage of development entirely subsequent to the Apostle, it is argued that, even if there be a fresh emphasis on piety within the sphere of the Church in the Pastorals, the idea is one that might naturally have come to St. Paul in view of changing conditions, and that the linguistic argument from the absence of εὐσεβής, etc., in the earlier Pauline Epistles proves nothing, since his use of the opposed group shows that it was mere accident (see Godliness). For ἀσέβεια in the sub-apostolic writings see 2 Clem. xvi. 1, ‘flee impiety’; and for ἀσεβής see 2 Clem. xviii. 1.

Literature.-H. Cremer, Biblico-Theological Lexicon of NT Greek, Edinburgh, 1880, p. 523 f.

Robert S. Franks.

Bibliography Information
Hastings, James. Entry for 'Ungodliness'. Hastings' Dictionary of the New Testament. https://www.studylight.org/​dictionaries/​eng/​hdn/​u/ungodliness.html. 1906-1918.
 
adsfree-icon
Ads FreeProfile