Lectionary Calendar
Friday, July 18th, 2025
the Week of Proper 10 / Ordinary 15
the Week of Proper 10 / Ordinary 15
video advertismenet
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
Attention!
For 10¢ a day you can enjoy StudyLight.org ads
free while helping to build churches and support pastors in Uganda.
Click here to learn more!
free while helping to build churches and support pastors in Uganda.
Click here to learn more!
Bible Commentaries
Peake's Commentary on the Bible Peake's Commentary
Copyright Statement
These files are public domain.
Text Courtesy of BibleSupport.com. Used by Permission.
These files are public domain.
Text Courtesy of BibleSupport.com. Used by Permission.
Bibliographical Information
Peake, Arthur. "Commentary on Romans 9". "Peake's Commentary on the Bible ". https://studylight.org/commentaries/eng/pfc/romans-9.html. 1919.
Peake, Arthur. "Commentary on Romans 9". "Peake's Commentary on the Bible ". https://studylight.org/
Whole Bible (48)New Testament (18)Gospels Only (1)Individual Books (14)
Verses 1-5
Romans 9:1-5 . Sorrow over the Reprobation of the Jews. Paulâ s rapture passes into anguish at the exclusion of his kinsmen from this blessedness. So the second theme of the epistle comes into view; see Introd. § 5 .
Romans 9:1 f. The apostle was denounced as a renegade ( Acts 21:28, etc.); hence his solemn protest ( cf. Romans 1:9, 2 Corinthians 1:23, 1 Thessalonians 2:5).
Romans 9:3 . His deeply-wounded love prompts the â wishââ almost a prayerââ that I were myself anathema,â that I were â cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers, my natural kinsfolk.ââ The Greek anathema ( cf. 1 Corinthians 1:23, Galatians 1:8) renders the Hebrew term for put-under-the-ban, as with Achan and his plunder (Joshua 7; cf. Joshua 6:17 f., Leviticus 27:28 f.).
Romans 9:4 f. This recital shows how far Paul is from disparaging his peopleâ s distinctions ( cf. Romans 2:1, Romans 3:2, Romans 15:8), and how tragic is their reprobation. â Israelitesââ the title of religious nobility ( Genesis 32:28, Psalms 73:1 , John 1:47, etc.). â The (national) adoptionâ (see Romans 8:15 *): â Israel is My son, My firstbornâ ( Exodus 4:22, etc.). â The gloryââ . the Shekinah of Exodus 16:10, etc., which attended the desert march and rested on the sacred Ark. â The Covenantsââ with Abraham, Moses, David; finally, that of Jeremiah 31:31-37. â Of whom,â not whose as in former clausesâ a case of origin, not possessionââ is the Christ,â etc.: the consummate honour of the Israelite race.
Romans 9:5 b is sometimes punctuated as a detached doxology: â God, who is over all, be blessed for ever! A rendering grammatical indeed, but forced and improbable. â Who is over all, God blessed for ever,â supplies the antithesis to â after the fleshâ ; cf. Romans 1:3 f., Galatians 4:4. Christ is not called â God over allâ : â over allâ affirms His Lordship ( 1 Corinthians 8:6, Php_2:9-11 , etc.); â God,â His oneness of being with the Father ( Colossians 2:9, Titus 2:13; John 10:30-38).
After all this, Israelâ s reprobation looks like Godâ s defeat. But â Godâ s word has not failedâ ; for God is acting, as always, in the sovereignty of His elective grace ( Romans 9:6-29), while Israel rejects His way of righteousness ( Romans 9:30 to Romans 10:21); in the end Israel will be saved (Romans 11).
Verses 6-18
Romans 9:6-18 . Godâ s Free Election.
Romans 9:6-9 . We must distinguish: â to be of Israel, is not to be Israel.â Mere physical heredity counts for nothing: â Isaacâ was the proper â seedâ of Abraham, designated as â the child of promiseâ ( Genesis 21:12, etc.). Here Isaacâ s case illustrates the sovereignty of God; in Romans 4:18-21, the efficacy of faith.
Romans 9:10-13 . The case of Esau and Jacob is equally significant. Twin offspring of the same parents, the unborn babes had done nothing to achieve merit or display worth, when God said, â The elder shall serve the younger,â an election governing the history of the descendant peoples ( Malachi 1:2 f.*).
Romans 9:14 . No Jew would deem â God unjustâ in such preferences; the question of Romans 9:14 answers itself. The application to contemporary Judaism is patent.
Romans 9:15 f. The election of Jacob recalls words used to Moses: â I will show mercy to whomsoever I will show mercy,â etc.â not that God is arbitrary in His compassions, but He is untrammeled; even Moses may not prescribe to Him. Hence the inference: â it is not of him that wills, nor of him that runsâ (as Moses was doing then, Paul now, for Israelâ s salvation), â but of God,â etc. ( cf. 1 Corinthians 3:6 f.). Dictation, like prerogative, is out of court.
Romans 9:17 f. This holds in respect of â hardeningâ too. Witness the Pharaoh of the Exodus: God â raisedâ this evil-hearted man to greatness, â on purpose to demonstrate His powerâ as the Judge of the earth. As the story shows, the monarchâ s defiant temper was the nemesis of unbelief; cf. Romans 1:24 ; Romans 1:28. In every decision God judges for Himself, despite human pleas of privilege and pride of power: â Whom He will He compassionates, whom He will He hardens.â
Verses 19-29
Romans 9:19-29 . The Divine Sovereignty in Judgment.
Romans 9:19 f. The hard saying just enunciated provokes the question, â Why does He blame,â if the hardening is His doing and â none may resist His willâ ? Paul forgoes the obvious retort, that Godâ s â hardeningâ is a judgment on hardness of heart ( cf. Romans 2:5 , etc.), that Pharaoh (and Israel now) did resist God ( cf. Acts 7:51, etc.); he assails the spirit of contradiction: â Nay, surely, O man, who art thou who repliest against Godâ the thing formed saying to its fashioner, Why didst thou make me so?â (see Isaiah 45:9). Such questions cast on God the responsibility for our miscarriages: whoever is to blame, He is not.â The â formingâ of Romans 9:20 is the shaping, not the creation, of the instrument.
Romans 9:21 . â The potter has a right over the clay, to make a vessel for honourable or ignoble use, from any part of the lumpâ he chooses. He has his reasons, but those reasons are for himself. â What right,â says the Jew, â has God to cast away sons of Abraham?â The right, answers Paul, of the potter, from which there is no appeal.
Romans 9:22 recalls Romans 9:17: â Supposing God, resolved to make an example of His punitive wrath, has borne longâ with evil-doers, rendering their doom in the end more terrible, who will gainsay Himâ in Pharaohâ s case, or (to read between the lines) in Israelâ s?
Romans 9:23 f. â Andâ supposing He did this â of purpose to make known His glorious wealth of mercy . . . in us,â for example, â whom He has called from amongst both Jews and Gentiles?â The suggestion is that Godâ s punitive judgments have mercy, somewhere, somehow, for their aim ( Romans 11:30 ff.). The â vessels of angerâ were chosen suitably, as well as sovereignly: Godâ s displeasure found, not made, them â fitted for destruction.â The antithetic clause, â which He prepared beforehand for gloryâ ( cf. Romans 8:30, Ephesians 2:10), associates God with all that leads to the happier choice, without denying manâ s co-operation ( cf. Php_2:12 f.).â Throughout Paul asserts the challenged right of God to deal judicially with Israel; he is not denying manâ s freedom in order to safeguard Godâ s sovereignty, but maintaining Godâ s freedom against Jewish presumption.â The sayings drawn from Hosea and Isaiah in Romans 9:25-29 reveal the disregard of previous status with which God â callsâ into favour â the once rejectedâ and selects â a remnantâ while rejecting the mass. Isaiah 10:22 f. and Isaiah 10:19 remind Israel how summary Godâ s ancient judgments had beenâ yet â leaving a seedâ to revive out of the waste.
Verses 30-33
Romans 9:30 to Romans 10:4 . Paul has discussed the Jewish situation as from Godâ s side; he proceeds to point out, from manâ s side, the Cause of Israelâ s Stumbling. This chs. 3â 5 have prepared us to understand.
Romans 9:30-32 a . The paradox is that â Gentiles, who were out of the way of righteousness, have obtained it; while Israel, intent upon a law of righteousness, missed the mark, because it rejected the way of faith (which Gentiles took), preferring that of works.â In other words ( Romans 10:3), Israel wanted â to set up its own righteousnessâ ( cf. Php_3:6 ; Php_3:9 ) and â did not recogniseâ nor â submit to Godâ s righteousness.â
Romans 9:32 b , Romans 9:33 . They stumbled at theâ old â stumbling-blockâ marked in Isaiah 8:14; Isaiah 28:16â the demand for â trustâ in God as the basis of salvation.
Romans 10:1 f. So Paulâ s â good-will and prayersâ ( cf. Romans 9:16), and Israelâ s unquestioned â zeal for God,â are unavailing. Their zeal â lacks knowledgeââ though the Jew prides himself on this ( Romans 2:18 f.)!
Romans 10:3. This ignorance is bound up with self-conceit and insubordination ( cf. Romans 2:4; also John 8:19; John 8:55, etc.).â On â the righteousness of God,â see Romans 1:17 *, Romans 3:22; Romans 3:26 *.
Romans 10:4 . The Jews deem the Mosaic system eternal; they fail to discern â the end of the law ( cf. 2 Corinthians 3:13-16, Hebrews 7:18 f., etc.) in Christ,â who, revealing Godâ s righteousness, imparts â righteousness to every believer.ââ end: i.e. terminus and goal; see Galatians 2:19; Galatians 3:24, Matthew 5:17, Luke 16:16.