the Week of Proper 22 / Ordinary 27
Click here to join the effort!
Read the Bible
Tyndale New Testament
1 Corinthians 1:13
Bible Study Resources
Concordances:
- Nave'sDictionaries:
- AmericanEncyclopedias:
- InternationalDevotionals:
- EveryParallel Translations
Has Jesus started playin' favorites? Was Paul hung on a cross to die for you? Quit being silly!
Has Christ been divided? Paul was not crucified for you, was he? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?
Has Christ been divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?
Is there a division in Christ? was Paul nailed to the cross for you? or were you given baptism in the name of Paul?
Is the Christ divided? has Paul been crucified for you? or have ye been baptised unto the name of Paul?
Is Christ divided? Was it Paul who was crucified for you? Or were you baptized in Paul's name?
Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized into the name of Paul?
Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you?
Is the Christ in fragments? Is it Paul who was crucified on your behalf? Or were you baptized to be Paul's adherents?
Is Christ diuided? was Paul crucified for you? or were yee baptized in the name of Paul?
Has Christ been divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized into the name of Paul?
Is Christ then deuyded in partes? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were ye baptysed in ye name of Paul?
and I of Christ." is the school of Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were you baptized into the name of Paul?
I ask you, "Has the Messiah been chopped up in little pieces so we can each have a relic all our own? Was Paul crucified for you? Was a single one of you baptized in Paul's name?" I was not involved with any of your baptisms—except for Crispus and Gaius—and on getting this report, I'm sure glad I wasn't. At least no one can go around saying he was baptized in my name. (Come to think of it, I also baptized Stephanas's family, but as far as I can recall, that's it.)
Has Christ been divided [into different parts]? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized into the name of Paul? [Certainly not!]
Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized into the name of Paul?
Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?
Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were you baptized into the name of Paul?
Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
Hath the Christ been divided? was Paul crucified for you? or to the name of Paul were ye baptized;
Christ has been divided up into different groups! Did Paul die on the cross for you? No! Were you baptized in the name of Paul? No!
Is Christ divided? Paul wasn't crucified for you, was he? Or were you in fact baptized in the name of Paul?
Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Were you baptized into the name of Paul?
Has Christ been divided up? Was I nailed to a cross for you? Were you baptized in my name?
Has the Messiah been split in pieces? Was it Sha'ul who was put to death on a stake for you? Were you immersed into the name of Sha'ul?
Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?
Is Christ deuided? was Paul crucified for you? either were ye baptized into the name of Paul?
Why? Is Christ divided? or was Paul crucified for you? or were you baptized in the name of Paul?
Is Messiah divided? Was Sha'ul crucified for you? Or were you immersed into the name of Sha'ul?
Has Christ been divided? Paul wasn't crucified for you, was he? You weren't baptized in Paul's name, were you?2 Corinthians 11:4; Ephesians 4:5;">[xr]
Is the Meshiha divided? Or was Paulos crucified for you ? Or in the name of Paulos were you baptized?
Now was Messiah divided? Or was Paul crucified for you? Or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?
Has Christ been divided into factions? Was I, Paul, crucified for you? Were any of you baptized in the name of Paul? Of course not!
Has Christ been divided? Was Paul put on a cross to die for your sins? Were you baptized in the name of Paul?
Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized into the name of Paul?
Has Christ been divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?
The Christ is divided! Was, Paul, crucified for you? Or, into the name of Paul, were ye immersed?
Is Christ divided? Was Paul then crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?
Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
Has Christ been divided? Paul was not crucified for you, was he? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?
Is Christe deuided? was Paul crucified for you? eyther were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
Christ cannot be divided into different groups. It wasn't Paul who died on the cross for you, was it? Were you baptized in Paul's name?
Has Christ been divided? Paul was not crucified for you, was he? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?
Christ has been divided into groups! Was it Paul who died on the cross for you? Were you baptized as Paul's disciples?
Whether Crist is departid? whether Poul was crucified for you, ether ye ben baptisid in the name of Poul?
Contextual Overview
Bible Verse Review
from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge
Christ: 2 Corinthians 11:4, Galatians 1:7, Ephesians 4:5
Paul: 1 Corinthians 6:19, 1 Corinthians 6:20, Romans 14:9, 2 Corinthians 5:14, 2 Corinthians 5:15, Titus 2:14
or: 1 Corinthians 1:15, 1 Corinthians 10:2, Matthew 28:19, Acts 2:38, Acts 10:48, Acts 19:5
Reciprocal: 1 Kings 16:21 - divided Matthew 23:8 - one John 4:2 - General Acts 8:16 - only Acts 16:15 - when Acts 18:8 - hearing 2 Corinthians 4:5 - we Galatians 6:4 - and not
Gill's Notes on the Bible
Is Christ divided?.... Some read the words as an assertion, "Christ is divided"; that is, his body, the church, is divided by such factions and parties; though in some copies μη, the note of interrogation, is put before the clause, and so to be rendered, "is Christ divided?" no; his human body was not to be divided; a bone of him was not to be broken, John 19:36; the seamless garment he wore was not to be rent asunder, John 19:23; nor is his mystical body, the church, to be torn in pieces by schisms and divisions; nor is anyone part of his Gospel different from, or opposite to another part of it; his doctrine is the same as preached by one minister and another, and is all of a piece, uniform and harmonious. Christ is not divided from his Father, not in nature; though he is to be distinguished from him, yet not to be divided; he is one in nature with him, though he is a distinct person from him; nor is he, nor can he, or will be ever separated from him; nor is he to be divided from him in his works and actions, with whom he was jointly concerned in creation, providence, and grace; and such are to be blamed as dividers of Christ from the Father, who talk of Christ to the exclusion of the Father, or to the dropping and neglect of any of his acts of grace; as his everlasting love to his chosen ones, the eternal election of them in Christ, the covenant of grace made with him, and the instance of his grace in the gift and mission of his Son: nor is Christ divided from himself, not in his nature and person; the two natures, human and divine, are united in one person; they are to be distinguished, and not to be confounded, yet not to be separated as to wake two distinct persons: nor in his offices; a whole Christ is to be received; Christ in his kingly as well as in his priestly office; to claim him as a Saviour and disown him as a King, is dishonourable to him; it is to make one end of his death void, as much as in such lies, which is, that he may be Lord of dead and living; and argues a carnal selfish spirit, and that faith in him is not right: such are to be blamed for being for Christ, and as dividers of him, who talk of being saved by him, and yet would not have him to rule over them. Nor is he divided from his Spirit, not from the person of the Spirit; he is to be distinguished from him as a person, but is one in nature with him; nor from his gifts and graces, which he has as man and Mediator without measure; nor from the work of the Spirit; for it is his grace the Spirit of God implants in the hearts of men: it comes from him, it centres in him, it makes men like him, and glorifies him; such who cry up Christ, and cry down the work of his Spirit upon the soul, are to be blamed for being for Christ, and to be reckoned dividers of them as much as in them lies: nor is Christ divided from his church and people; there is a close union between them, and he dwells in them, and among them; and they are to be blamed that talk of Christ, and never meet with his saints in public service and worship: nor is he divided from his ministers, word, and ordinances; Christ is the sum of the ministry of the word; the ordinances are instituted by him; he submitted to them himself, and is the substance of them, and has promised his presence in them to the end of the world: and what God has put together, let no man put asunder.
Was Paul crucified for you? no; he had taught them another doctrine; namely, that Christ was crucified for them, that he died for their sins, and had bought them with the price of his own blood; and therefore they were not to be the servants of men, or to call any man master, or to be called by his name, or any other man's, only by Christ's, who had redeemed them by his blood; so that they were not their own, nor any other's, but his, and ought to glorify him with their souls and bodies, which were his.
Or were ye baptized in the name of Paul; no; but in the name of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. The apostle did not pretend to be the author of a new revelation, or the propagator of a new religion, but was a preacher of the Gospel, and an administrator of the ordinances of Christ; wherefore he baptized not in his own name, but in the name of Christ: to whose worship and service such as are baptized are devoted, and not to the service of men, and therefore not to be called after their names.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
Is Christ divided? - Paul, in this verse, proceeds to show the impropriety of their divisions and strifes. His general argument is, that Christ alone ought to be regarded as their head and leader, and that his claims, arising from his crucifixion, and acknowledged by their baptism, were so pre-eminent that they could not be divided, and the honors due to him should not be rendered to any other. The apostle, therefore, asks, with strong emphasis, whether Christ was to be regarded as divided? Whether this single Supreme Head and Leader of the church, had become the head of different contending factions? The strong absurdity of supposing that, showed the impropriety of their ranging themselves under different banners and leaders.
Was Paul crucified for you? - This question implies that the crucifixion of Christ had an influence in saving them which the sufferings of no other one could have, and that those sufferings were in fact the speciality which distinguished the work of Christ, and rendered it of so much value. The atonement was the grand, crowning work of the Lord Jesus. It was through this that all the Corinthian Christians had been renewed and pardoned. That work was so pre-eminent that it could not have been performed by another. And as they had all been saved by that alone; as they were alike dependent on his merits for salvation, it was improper that they should be torn into contending factions, and ranged under different leaders. If there is anything that will recall Christians of different names and of contending sects from the heat of strife, it is the recollection of the fact that they have been purchased by the same blood, and that the same Saviour died to redeem them all. If this fact could be kept before their minds, it would put an end to angry strife everywhere in the church, and produce universal Christian love.
Or were ye baptized in the name of Paul - Or, “into,” or “unto” the name of Paul; see the note at Matthew 28:19. To be baptized “into,” or “unto” anyone is to be devoted to him, to receive and acknowledge him as a teacher, professing to receive his rules, and to be governed by his authority - Locke. Paul here solemnly reminds them that their baptism was an argument why they should not range themselves under different leaders. By that, they had been solemnly and entirely devoted to the service of the only Saviour. “Did I ever,” was the implied language of Paul, “baptize in my own name? Did I ever pretend to organize a sect, announcing myself as a leader? Have not I always directed you to that Saviour into whose name and service you have been baptized?” It is remarkable here, that Paul refers to himself, and not to Apollos or Peter. He does not insinuate that the claims of Apollos or Peter were to be disparaged, or their talents and influence to be undervalued, as a jealous rival would have done; but he numbers himself first, and alone, as having no claims to be regarded as a religious leader among them, or the founder of a sect. Even he, the founder of the church, and their spiritual father, had never desired or intended that they should call themselves by his name; and he thus showed the impropriety of their adopting the name of any man as the leader of a sect.
Clarke's Notes on the Bible
Verse 1 Corinthians 1:13. Is Christ divided? — Can he be split into different sects and parties? Has he different and opposing systems? Or, is the Messiah to appear under different persons?
Was Paul crucified for you? — As the Gospel proclaims salvation through the crucified only, has Paul poured out his blood as an atonement for you? This is impossible, and therefore your being called by my name is absurd; for his disciples you should be, alone, who has bought you by his blood.
Were ye baptized in the name of Paul? — To be baptized in, or into the name of one, implied that the baptized was to be the disciple of him into whose name, religion, c., he was baptized. As if he said: Did I ever attempt to set up a new religion, one founded on my own authority, and coming from myself? On the contrary, have I not preached Christ crucified for the sin of the world and called upon all mankind, both Jews and Gentiles, to believe on Him?
