the Fourth Week after Easter
Click here to join the effort!
Read the Bible
J.B. Rotherham Emphasized Bible
Proverbs 28:21
Bible Study Resources
Concordances:
- Nave'sDictionaries:
- AmericanEncyclopedias:
- InternationalParallel Translations
It is not good to show partiality—yet even a courageous person may sin for a piece of bread.
To show partiality is not good; Yet a man will do wrong for a piece of bread.
To have respect of persons is not good: for for a piece of bread that man will transgress.
To show partiality is not good, but for a piece of bread a man will do wrong.
To show partiality is not good, Because for a piece of bread a man will do wrong.
It is not good for a judge to take sides, but some will sin for only a piece of bread.
To have regard for one person over another and to show favoritism is not good, Because for a piece of bread a man will transgress.
To show partiality is not good; Yet a man will do wrong for a piece of bread.
To haue respect of persons is not good: for that man will transgresse for a piece of bread.
To show partiality is not good,Even for a piece of bread a man will transgress.
To show partiality is not good, because a man may sin for a piece of bread.
It isn't right to be unfair, but some people can be bribed with only a piece of bread.
To show partiality is not good, though a person may do wrong for a crust of bread.
To have respect of persons is not good; but for a piece of bread will a man transgress.
It is wrong for a judge to support someone simply because he knows them. But some judges will change their decisions for the price of a loaf of bread.
A man who shows partiality is not good; for a piece of bread a man will become a traitor.
Prejudice is wrong. But some judges will do wrong to get even the smallest bribe.
Showing partiality is not good, and over a morsel of bread, a strong man will do wrong.
To respect faces is not good, yea, for a man will transgress for a piece of bread.
To haue respecte of personnes in iudgment is not good: And why? he will do wronge, yee euen for a pece of bred.
To have respect of persons is not good; Neither that a man should transgress for a piece of bread.
It is not good to have respect for a man's position: for a man will do wrong for a bit of bread.
To have respect of persons is not good; for a man will transgress for a piece of bread.
To haue respect of persons, is not good: for, for a piece of bread that man will transgresse.
To haue respect of persons [in iudgement] is not good, for that man wyll do wrong, yea euen for a peece of bread.
A hearth for coals, and wood for fire; and railing man for the tumult of strife.
To have respect of persons is not good: neither that a man should transgress for a piece of bread.
He that knowith a face in doom, doith not wel; this man forsakith treuthe, yhe, for a mussel of breed.
To have respect of persons is not good; Neither that a [noble] man should transgress for a piece of bread.
To have respect of persons [is] not good: for, for a piece of bread [that] man will transgress.
To show partiality is terrible, for a person will transgress over the smallest piece of bread.
To show partiality is not good, Because for a piece of bread a man will transgress.
Showing partiality is never good, yet some will do wrong for a mere piece of bread.
To show favor is not good, because a man will sin for a piece of bread.
To show partiality is not good— yet for a piece of bread a person may do wrong.
He that hath respect to a person in judgment, doth not well: such a man even for a morsel of bread forsaketh the truth.
To show partiality is not good; but for a piece of bread a man will do wrong.
To discern faces is not good, And for a piece of bread doth a man transgress.
Playing favorites is always a bad thing; you can do great harm in seemingly harmless ways.
To show partiality is not good, Because for a piece of bread a man will transgress.
Contextual Overview
Bible Verse Review
from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge
respect: Proverbs 18:5, Proverbs 24:23, Exodus 23:2, Exodus 23:8
for: Erasmus observes that this expression probably originated from the circumstance of holding out a piece of bread to a dog, in order to soothe him. Ezekiel 13:19, Hosea 4:18, Micah 3:5, Micah 7:3, Romans 16:18, 2 Peter 2:3
Reciprocal: Judges 18:4 - hired me Isaiah 29:21 - and turn Amos 2:7 - pant Mark 14:11 - and promised James 2:1 - with
Cross-References
My might and melody, is Yah, And he became mine, by salvation, - This, is my GOD, and I will glorify him, The God of my father and I will set him on high.
Thou hast avowed to-day that Yahweh, shall be, thy God, and that thou wilt walk in his ways, and keep his statutes and his commandments and his regulations and wilt hearken unto his voice.
then shall it be, that, whosoever cometh forth out of the doors of my house, to meet me, when I return successful, from the sons of Ammon, shall belong unto Yahweh, and I will offer him up, as an ascending-sacrifice.
for thy servant vowed, a vow, while I abode in Geshur in Syria, saying, - If Yahweh, will but bring me back, unto Jerusalem, then will I serve Yahweh,
And, Mephibosheth, son of Saul, came down to meet the king, - he had neither dressed his feet, nor trimmed his beard, nor, his clothes, had he washed, from the day the king departed, until the day that he entered in peace.
And Mephibosheth said unto the king, Even the whole, let him take, - now that my lord the king hath entered, in peace, into his own house.
Then said Naaman, Shall there not, then, I pray thee, be given to thy servant, two mules' burden of earth? For thy servant will henceforth offer neither ascending-offering nor sacrifice to other gods, save only to Yahweh.
Gill's Notes on the Bible
To have respect of persons [is] not good, c, In courts of judicature, to give a cause or pass sentence in favour of a person, because he is rich, or is a relation, a friend, an acquaintance, or has done a kindness and against another, because of the reverse, Leviticus 19:15; nor in religious assemblies, making a difference between the rich and the poor, James 2:1; this is not good in itself, nor productive of good effects, and cannot be well pleasing to God, who himself is no respecter of persons;
for for a piece of bread [that] man will transgress; the laws of God and men; having used himself to such unrighteous methods of proceeding, he will do any base action for a small gain, he will stick at nothing, and do it for anything; as Cato used to say of M. Coelius the tribune,
"that he might be hired, for a morsel of bread, to speak or hold his peace;''
see Ezekiel 13:19.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
Dishonest partiality leads men who have enslaved themselves to it to transgress, even when the inducement is altogether disproportionate. A âpiece of breadâ was proverbial at all times as the most extreme point of poverty (compare the marginal reference).