the Week of Proper 14 / Ordinary 19
free while helping to build churches and support pastors in Uganda.
Click here to learn more!
Read the Bible
J.B. Rotherham Emphasized Bible
Deuteronomy 14:11
Bible Study Resources
Concordances:
- Nave'sDictionaries:
- AmericanEncyclopedias:
- InternationalParallel Translations
“You may eat every clean bird,
Of all clean birds you may eat.
Of all clean birds ye shall eat.
"All of the birds that are clean you may eat.
"You may eat all clean birds.
You may eat any clean bird.
All ritually clean birds you may eat.
"You may eat any clean bird.
"You may eat any clean bird.
Of all cleane birdes ye shall eate:
"You may eat any clean bird.
You can eat any clean bird.
"You may eat any clean bird;
All clean birds shall ye eat.
"You may eat any clean bird.
Of all clean birds you shall eat.
"You may eat any clean bird.
You shall eat of all clean birds.
Eate of all cleane foules.
Of all clean birds ye may eat.
All clean birds may be used for food.
Of all cleane byrdes ye shall eate.
Of all clean birds ye may eat.
Of all cleane birds ye shall eate.
Ye shall eat every clean bird.
Of all clean birds ye may eat.
You may eat any clean bird,
Ete ye alle clene briddis;
`Any clean bird ye do eat;
Of all clean birds you may eat.
[Of] all clean birds ye shall eat.
Of all clean birds you may eat.
"All clean birds you may eat.
"You may eat any bird that is ceremonially clean.
"You may eat any clean bird.
You may eat any clean birds.
All birds that are clean you shall eat.
"You may eat all clean birds.
You may eat any ritually clean bird. These are the exceptions, so don't eat these: eagle, vulture, black vulture, kite, falcon, the buzzard family, the raven family, ostrich, nighthawk, the hawk family, little owl, great owl, white owl, pelican, osprey, cormorant, stork, the heron family, hoopoe, bat.
"You may eat any clean bird.
Contextual Overview
Bible Verse Review
from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge
Cross-References
And Abram took Sarai his wife, and Lot his brother's son, with all the goods that they bad gathered and the souls that they had gained in Haran, - and they came forth to go towards the land of Canaan, and came in to the land of Canaan.
So he brought back all the goods, - yea Lot also his brother with his goods, did he bring back, and the women also, and the people.
Then said the king of Sodom unto Abram, - Give unto me the persons, but the goods, take thou for thyself.
Thine ox slaughtered before thine eyes, and thou shalt not eat thereof, Thine ass stolen from before thee, and shall not be restored to thee, - Thy flock given to thine enemies, and thou shalt have none to save.
Yahweh, will smite thee, with a grievous boil, upon the knees and upon the legs, of which thou canst not he healed, - from the sole of thy foot even unto the crown of thy head.
then shall be eat the young of thy cattle and the fruit of thy ground until thou art destroyed, who will not leave for thee corn, new wine or oil, the young of thy kine, or the ewes of thy flock, - until he hath caused thee to perish.
Gill's Notes on the Bible
Of all clean birds ye shall eat. Which the Targum of Jonathan describes, everyone that has a craw, and whose crop is naked, and has a superfluous talon, and is not rapacious; but such as are unclean are expressed by name in the following verses, so that all except them might be reckoned clean and fit for food. Maimonides p observes, that only the number of the unclean are reckoned, so that all the rest are free.
p Hilchot. Maacolot Asurot, c. 1. sect. 14.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
Compare Leviticus 11:0. The variations here, whether omissions or additions, are probably to be explained by the time and circumstances of the speaker.
Deuteronomy 14:5
The “pygarg” is a species of gazelle, and the “wild ox” and “chamois” are swift types of antelope.
Deuteronomy 14:21
The prohibition is repeated from Leviticus 22:8. The directions as to the disposal of the carcass are unique to Deuteronomy, and their motive is clear. To have forbidden the people either themselves to eat that which had died, or to allow any others to do so, would have involved loss of property, and consequent temptation to an infraction of the command. The permissions now for the first time granted would have been useless in the wilderness. During the 40 years’ wandering there could be but little opportunity of selling such carcasses; while non-Israelites living in the camp would in such a matter be bound by the same rules as the Israelites Leviticus 17:15; Leviticus 24:22. Further, it would seem (compare Leviticus 17:15) that greater stringency is here given to the requirement of abstinence from that which had died of itself. Probably on this, as on so many other points, allowance was made for the circumstances of the people. Flesh meat was no doubt often scarce in the desert. It would therefore have been a hardship to forbid entirely the use of that which had not been killed. However, now that the plenty of the promised land was before them, the modified toleration of this unholy food was withdrawn.
