the Week of Proper 28 / Ordinary 33
free while helping to build churches and support pastors in Uganda.
Click here to learn more!
Read the Bible
King James Version
Matthew 22:35
Bible Study Resources
Concordances:
- Nave'sDictionaries:
- AmericanEncyclopedias:
- InternationalParallel Translations
Then one of them, an expert in the Law of Moses, asked Jesus a question to test him.
and one of them which was a doctoure of lawe axed a question teptinge h m and sayinge:
One of them, an expert in the law, tested him by asking,Luke 10:25;">[xr]
And one of them, a lawyer, asked Him a question, testing Him:
One Pharisee, who was an expert on the law of Moses, asked Jesus this question to test him:
And one of them, a lawyer, asked him a question, trying him:
Then one of them [who was] a lawyer, asked [him a question], tempting him, and saying,
One of them, a lawyer [an expert in Mosaic Law], asked Jesus a question, to test Him:
And one of them, a lawyer, asked him a question to test him.
One of them, a lawyer, asked him a question, testing him.
And one of them, a scribe, asked him a question,
and one of them, an expounder of the Law, asked Him as a test question,
And oon of hem, a techere of the lawe, axide Jhesu, and temptide him,
And one of them, a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him,
One of them, an expert in the law, tested Him with a question:
One of them was an expert in the Jewish Law. So he tried to test Jesus by asking,
And one of them, a lawyer, asked him a question, trying him:
And one of them, a teacher of the law, put a question to him, testing him, and saying,
and one of them who was a Torah expert asked a sh'eilah to trap him:
And one of them, a lawyer, demanded, tempting him, and saying,
And one from them, who was skilful in the law, questioned him, tempting him,
and one of them, who was expert in the law, to tempt him, inquired:
Then one of them, which was a Lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying,
One of them, an expert in religious law, tried to trap him with this question:
A proud religious law-keeper who knew the Law tried to trap Jesus. He said,
and one of them, a lawyer, asked him a question to test him.
And one of them, which was an expounder of the Lawe, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying,
And one of them who knew the law, asked him, testing him,
and one from among them, a lawyer, proposed a question, putting him to the test:
And one of them, a doctor of the law, asked him, tempting him:
And one of them, a lawyer, asked him a question, to test him.
And one of them, which was a lawyer, asked hym a question, temptyng hym, and saying:
and one of them, a teacher of the Law, tried to trap him with a question.
And one of them, an expert in the law, asked a question to test him:
One of them, a lawyer, asked him a question, testing him.
And one of them, a legal expert, put a question to him to test him:
And one of them, a lawyer, questioned Him , testing Him, and saying,
and one of them, a lawyer, did question, tempting him, and saying,
And one of them (a Scrybe) tepted him, and sayde:
In the mean time one of them, a Doctor of the law, to try him, started this question, master,
And one of them, an expert in religious law, asked him a question to test him:
Then one of them, a lawyer, asked Him a question, testing Him, and saying,
One of them was a know-it-all when it came to the code of Moses and he tried to trap Jesus with a question. He asked Jesus,
One of them, a lawyer, asked Him a question, testing Him,
And one of them, a scholar of the Law, asked Him a question, testing Him,
Contextual Overview
Bible Verse Review
from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge
a lawyer: Luke 7:30, Luke 10:25-37, Luke 11:45, Luke 11:46, Luke 11:52, Luke 14:3, Titus 3:13
tempting: Matthew 22:18, Mark 10:2
Reciprocal: Psalms 36:3 - The words Psalms 62:4 - consult Jeremiah 42:20 - For ye Matthew 16:1 - tempting Matthew 19:3 - tempting Mark 8:11 - Pharisees Luke 11:54 - seeking
Gill's Notes on the Bible
Then one of them, which was a lawyer,.... Or that was "learned", or "skilful in the law", as the Syriac and Persic versions, and Munster's Hebrew Gospel read. The Ethiopic version calls him, "a Scribe of the city", of the city of Jerusalem; but I do not meet with any such particular officer, or any such office peculiar to a single man any where: mention is made of "the Scribes of the people" in Matthew 2:4 and this man was one of them, one that interpreted the law to the people, either in the schools, or in the synagogues, or both; and Mark expressly calls him a "Scribe": and so the Arabic version renders the word here; and from hence it may be concluded that the lawyers and Scribes were the same sort of persons. This man was by sect a Pharisee, and by his office a Scribe; or interpreter of the law, and suitable to his office and character,
asked him a question, tempting him, and saying: he put a difficult and knotty question to him, and thereby making a trial of his knowledge and understanding of the law; and laying a snare for him, to entrap him if he could, and expose him to the people, as a very ignorant man: and delivered it in the following form.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
Jesus converses with a Pharisee respecting the law - See also Mark 12:28-34.
Matthew 22:34
The Pharisees ... were gathered together - That is, either to rejoice that their great rivals, the Sadducees, had been so completely silenced, or to lay a new plan for ensnaring him, or perhaps both. They would rejoice that the Sadducees had been confounded, but they would not be the less desirous to involve Jesus in difficulty. They therefore endeavored, probably, to find the most difficult question in dispute among themselves, and proposed it to him to perplex him.
Matthew 22:35
A lawyer - This does nor mean one that “practiced” law, as among us, but one learned or skilled in the law of Moses.
Mark calls him “one of the scribes.” This means the same thing. The scribes were men of learning - particularly men skilled in the law of Moses. This lawyer had heard Jesus reasoning with the Sadducees, and perceived that he had put them to silence. He was evidently supposed by the Pharisees to be better qualified to hold a debate with him than the Sadducees were, and they had therefore put him forward for that purpose. This man was probably of a candid turn of mind; perhaps willing to know the truth, and not entering very fully into their malicious intentions, but acting as their agent, Mark 12:34.
Tempting him - Trying him. Proposing a question to test his knowledge of the law.
Matthew 22:36
Which is the great commandment? - That is, the “greatest” commandment, or the one most important.
The Jews are said to have divided the law into “greater and smaller” commandments. Which was of the greatest importance they had not determined. Some held that it was the law respecting sacrifice; others, that respecting circumcision; others, that pertaining to washings and purifying, etc.
The law - The word “law” has a great variety of significations; it means, commonly, in the Bible, as it does here, “the law given by Moses,” recorded in the first five books of the Bible.
Matthew 22:37
Jesus said unto him ... - Mark says that he introduced this by referring to the doctrine of the unity of God “Hear, O Israel! the Lord thy God is one Lord” - taken from Deuteronomy 6:4. This was said, probably, because all true obedience depends on the correct knowledge of God. None can keep his commandments who are not acquainted with his nature, his perfections, and his right to command,
Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart - The meaning of this is, thou shalt love him with all thy faculties or powers. Thou shalt love him supremely, more than all other beings and things, and with all the ardor possible. To love him with all the heart is to fix the affections supremely on him, more strongly than on anything else, and to be willing to give up all that we hold dear at his command,
With all thy soul - Or, with all thy “life.” This means, to be willing to give up the life to him, and to devote it all to his service; to live to him, and to be willing to die at his command,
With all thy mind - To submit the “intellect” to his will. To love his law and gospel more than we do the decisions of our own minds. To be willing to submit all our faculties to his teaching and guidance, and to devote to him all our intellectual attainments and all the results of our intellectual efforts.
“With all thy strength” (Mark). With all the faculties of soul and body. To labor and toil for his glory, and to make that the great object of all our efforts.
Matthew 22:38
This the first tend great commandment - This commandment is found in Deuteronomy 6:5. It is the “first” and greatest of all; first, not in “order of time,” but of “importance; greatest” in dignity, in excellence, in extent, and duration. It is the fountain of all others. All beings are to be loved according to their excellence. As God is the most excellent and glorious of all beings, he is to be loved supremely. If he is loved aright, then our affections will be directed toward all created objects in a right manner.
Matthew 22:39
The second is like unto it - Leviticus 19:18. That is, it resembles it in importance, dignity, purity, and usefulness. This had not been asked by the lawyer, but Jesus took occasion to acquaint him with the substance of the whole law. For its meaning, see the notes at Matthew 19:19. Compare Romans 13:9. Mark adds, “there is none other commandment greater than these.” None respecting circumcision or sacrifice is greater. They are the fountain of all.
Matthew 22:40
On these two commandments hang ... - That is, these comprehend the substance of what Moses in the law and what the prophets have spoken.
What they have said has been to endeavor to win people to love God and to love each other. Love to God and man comprehends the whole of religion, and to produce this has been the design of Moses, the prophets, the Saviour, and the apostles.
Mark Mark 12:32-34 adds that the scribe said, “Well, Master, thou hast said the truth;” and that he assented to what Jesus had said, and admitted that to love God and man in this manner was more than all burnt-offerings and sacrifices; that is, was of more value or importance. Jesus, in reply, told him that he was “not far from the kingdom of heaven;” in other words, by his reply he had shown that he was almost prepared to receive the doctrines of the gospel. He had evinced such an acquaintance with the law as to prove that he was nearly prepared to receive the teachings of Jesus. See the notes at Matthew 3:2.
Mark and Luke say that this had such an effect that no man after that durst ask him any question, Luke 20:40; Mark 12:34. This does not mean that none of his disciples durst ask him any question, but none of the Jews. He had confounded all their sects - the Herodians Matthew 22:15-22; the Sadducees Matthew 22:23-33; and, last, the Pharisees Matthew 22:34-40. Finding themselves unable to confound him, everyone gave up the attempt at last.
Clarke's Notes on the Bible
Verse 35. A lawyer — νομικος, a teacher of the law. What is called lawyer, in the common translation, conveys a wrong idea to most readers: my old MS. renders the word in the same way I have done. These teachers of the law were the same as the scribes, or what Dr. Wotton calls letter-men, whom he supposes to be the same as the Karaites, a sect of the Jews who rejected all the traditions of the elders, and admitted nothing but the written word. See Wotton's Mishna, vol. i. p. 78. These are allowed to have kept more closely to the spiritual meaning of the law and prophets than the Pharisees did; and hence the question proposed by the lawyer, (Mark, Mark 12:28, calls him one of the scribes,) or Karaite, was of a more spiritual or refined nature than any of the preceding.
