the Week of Christ the King / Proper 29 / Ordinary 34
free while helping to build churches and support pastors in Uganda.
Click here to learn more!
Read the Bible
Amplified Bible
Romans 2:26
Bible Study Resources
Concordances:
- Nave'sDictionaries:
- AmericanEncyclopedias:
- InternationalDevotionals:
- Today'sParallel Translations
Those who are not Jews are not circumcised. But if they do what the law says, it is as if they were circumcised.
So, if a man who is uncircumcised keeps the precepts of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?
Therfore if the vncircumcised kepe the ryght thinges contayned in the lawe: shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
If therefore the uncircumcised keep the ordinances of the law, won't his uncircumcision be accounted as circumcision?
So if a man who is uncircumcised keeps the requirements of the law, his uncircumcision will be regarded as circumcision, won't it?Acts 10:34-35;">[xr]
So if the uncircumcised man keeps the requirements of the Law, will his uncircumcision not be regarded as circumcision?
People who are not Jews are not circumcised, but if they do what the law says, it is as if they were circumcised.
If therefore the uncircumcision keeps the ordinances of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision?
Therefore, if the uncircumcision keepeth the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
So, if a man who is uncircumcised keeps the precepts of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?
If therefore the uncircumcised keep the ordinances of the law, won't his uncircumcision be accounted as circumcision?
Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
In the same way if an uncircumcised man pays attention to the just requirements of the Law, shall not his lack of circumcision be overlooked, and,
Therfor if prepucie kepe the riytwisnessis of the lawe, whethir his prepucie schal not be arettid in to circumcisioun?
If therefore the uncircumcision keep the ordinances of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision?
If a man who is not circumcised keeps the requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?
In fact, if they obey the Law, they are as good as anyone who is circumcised.
If therefore the uncircumcision keep the ordinances of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision?
If those who have not circumcision keep the rules of the law, will it not be credited to them as circumcision?
Therefore, if an uncircumcised man keeps the righteous requirements of the Torah, won't his uncircumcision be counted as circumcision?
If therefore the uncircumcision keep the requirements of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision,
But if the uncircumcision shall keep the commandment of the law, is not uncircumcisedness reckoned to him (as) circumcision ?
And if uncircumcision should keep the precepts of the law, would not that uncircumcision be accounted as circumcision?
Therefore, if the vncircumcision keepe the righteousnesse of the Law, shall not his vncircumcision be counted for Circumcision?
And if the Gentiles obey God's law, won't God declare them to be his own people?
If a person who is not a Jew and has not gone through the act of becoming a Jew, obeys the Law, God will think of him as a Jew.
So, if those who are uncircumcised keep the requirements of the law, will not their uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?
Therefore if the vncircumcision keepe the ordinances of the Lawe, shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
Therefore, if the uncircumcision keep the statutes of the law, behold would not the uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
If then, the uncircumcision, be guarding the righteous requirement of the law, shall not, his uncircumcision, as circumcision be reckoned? -
If then, the uncircumcised keep the justices of the law, shall not this uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
Therefore if the vncircumcisio kepe the ordinaunces of the law, shall not his vncircumcisio be counted for circumcisio?
If the Gentile, who is not circumcised, obeys the commands of the Law, will not God regard him as though he were circumcised?
So if an uncircumcised man keeps the law’s requirements, will not his uncircumcision be counted as circumcision?
Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
Therefore, if the uncircumcised person follows the requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be credited for circumcision?
If, then, the uncircumcision keeps the ordinances of the Law, will not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
If, therefore the uncircumcision the righteousness of the law may keep, shall not his uncircumcision for circumcision be reckoned?
Therfore yf the vncircumcision kepe the righte thinges conteyned in the lawe, shal not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
if therefore an uncircumcised Gentile keep the moral precepts contained in the law, shall not he be reckon'd, as if he were circumcised?
Therefore if the uncircumcised man obeys the righteous requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?
Therefore, if an uncircumcised man keeps the righteous requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be counted as circumcision?
If an outsider (someone who's not a Jew) follows the Code, but doesn't have his pickle clipped, don't you realize God will regard him as if he were circumcised?
So if the uncircumcised man keeps the requirements of the Law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?
So if the uncircumcised man observes the righteous requirements of the Law, will not his uncircumcision be counted as circumcision?
Contextual Overview
Bible Verse Review
from Treasury of Scripure Knowledge
Isaiah 56:6, Isaiah 56:7, Matthew 8:11, Matthew 8:12, Matthew 15:28, Acts 10:2-4, Acts 10:34, Acts 10:35, Acts 11:3-18, 1 Corinthians 7:18, 1 Corinthians 7:19, Philippians 3:3, Colossians 2:11
Reciprocal: Joshua 5:5 - they had not Jeremiah 9:25 - that Ezekiel 16:52 - which hast Romans 2:1 - whosoever
Gill's Notes on the Bible
Therefore if the uncircumcision keep,.... These words are spoken hypothetically; if any such persons could be found among the Gentiles who keep the whole law of God; and can only be absolutely understood of such, who from a principle of grace act in obedience to the law; as in the hands of Christ, and who look to Christ as the fulfilling end of it, for righteousness; in whom they keep
the righteousness of the law perfectly:
shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision? by this question it is suggested, that an uncircumcised Gentile, who keeps the law as in the hands of Christ, and under the influences of his Spirit and grace, and keeps it in Christ, is reckoned a circumcised person in a spiritual sense, and must be preferable to a circumcised Jew that breaks it.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
Therefore, if the uncircumcision - If those who are not circumcised, that is, the pagan.
Keep the righteousness of the law - Keep what the Law of Moses commands. It could not be supposed that a pagan would understand the requirements of the ceremonial law; but reference is had here to the moral law. The apostle does not expressly affirm that this was ever done; but he supposes the case, to show the true nature and value of the rites of the Jews.
Shall not his uncircumcision - Or, shall the fact that he is uncircumcised stand in the way of the acceptance of his services? Or, shall he not as certainly and as readily be accepted by God as if he were a Jew? Or in other words, the apostle teaches the doctrine that acceptance with God does not depend on a manâs external privileges, but on the state of the heart and life.
Be counted for circumcision - Shall he not be treated as if he were circumcised? Shall his being uncircumcised be any barrier in the way of his acceptance with God? The word rendered âbe counted,â is what is commonly rendered âto reckon, to imputeâ; and its use here shows that the Scripture use of the word is not to transfer, or to charge with what is not deserved, or not true. It means simply that a man shall be treated as if it were so; that this lack of circumcision shall be no bar to acceptance. There is nothing set over to his account; nothing transferred; nothing reckoned different from what it is. God judges things as they are; and as the man, though uncircumcised, who keeps the Law, ought to be treated as if he had been circumcised, so he who believes in Christ agreeably to the divine promise, and trusts to his merits alone for salvation, ought to be treated as if he were himself righteous, God judges the thing as it is, and treats people as it is proper to treat them, as being pardoned and accepted through his Son.
Clarke's Notes on the Bible
Verse 26. Therefore if the uncircumcision, &c.] If the Gentile be found to act according to the spirit and design of the law, his acting thus uprightly, according to the light which God has afforded him, will be reckoned to him as if he were circumcised and walked agreeably to the law.