Lectionary Calendar
Friday, November 22nd, 2024
the Week of Proper 28 / Ordinary 33
Attention!
Tired of seeing ads while studying? Now you can enjoy an "Ads Free" version of the site for as little as 10¢ a day and support a great cause!
Click here to learn more!

Language Studies

Aramaic Thoughts

Aramaic Literature - Part 17 - The Mishnah

To begin with a follow-up to last week’s column, there are two books that are both informative and entertaining regarding the Black Plague. The first is Barbara Tuchman’s A Distant Mirror. It is a history of the fourteenth century, and as such contains a fair amount of discussion concerning the outbreaks of the plague that devastated Europe in the latter half of the fourteenth century, The second, John Kelly’s The Great Mortality, focuses on the plague itself, tracing the movement of the disease from its beginnings in the Far East to its end in Scandinavia. The death estimates vary, but on average the plague probably killed 30% to 40% of all Europeans, and it was centuries before the European population once again achieved pre-plague levels.

Following the Tohoroth section of the division Tohoroth is the treatise Mikwaoth (immersion pools). Literally the word means “gathering places” from the word miqweh “and the waters that were gathered together he called seas” (Genesis 1:10). These are the “baths” of “baptismal pools” that receive so much attention in modern discussions of Jewish baptism rituals and the development of Christian baptism. According to this treatise, there are six grades of pools. Ranking from least to most efficacious, they are: 1) ponds containing less than forty seahs of water (approximately 60 gallons); 2) rain-ponds while it is still raining; 3) ponds that contain forty seahs or more of water; 4) a well the water level of which is increased by drawn water; 5) “smitten water” that is, “water that is salty or from a hot spring (Danby, p. 733, n. 9); and 6) living waters, that is a flowing stream. These pools or streams were used for washing in order to render the unclean clean (see again the cleansing rituals in Leviticus 12-15. If is determined that there was insufficient water in the pool, then the cleansing ritual was determined to be inadequate, and had to be repeated. These pools may also be rendered unclean by the admission of certain items into the pool, or touching the water that entered the pool.

All seas qualify as mikwaoth on the basis of Genesis 1:10. In addition, “if a wave was sundered [from the face of the sea] and contained forty seahs and it fell upon a man or upon vessels [that were unclean], they become clean” (5.6). In addition, the land of Israel is considered clean, and its pools are considered clean. This of course reflects the situation when many Jews were living outside the bounds of Israel. Thus a trip to Israel and an immersing in a pool there would certainly be sufficient to render one clean.

It was also necessary for there to be nothing between the body and the water for the immersion to be valid (Danby, p. 742, n. 5). Interestingly, a woman’s pubic hair was considered to interpose between the water and the body, as was the hair of a man’s beard (9.2), but a man’s pubic hair did not (9.3), though this latter was a somewhat disputed point.

Subscribe …
Receive the newest article each week in your inbox by joining the "Aramaic Thoughts" subscription list. Enter your email address below, click "Subscribe!" and we will send you a confirmation email. Follow the instructions in the email to confirm your addition to this list.

Copyright Statement
'Aramaic Thoughts' Copyright 2024© Benjamin Shaw. 'Aramaic Thoughts' articles may be reproduced in whole under the following provisions: 1) A proper credit must be given to the author at the end of each story, along with a link to https://www.studylight.org/language-studies/aramaic-thoughts.html  2) 'Aramaic Thoughts' content may not be arranged or "mirrored" as a competitive online service.

Meet the Author
Dr. Shaw was born and raised in New Mexico. He received his undergraduate degree at the University of New Mexico in 1977, the M. Div. from Pittsburgh Theological Seminary in 1980, and the Th.M. from Princeton Theological Seminary in 1981, with an emphasis in biblical languages (Greek, Hebrew, Old Testament and Targumic Aramaic, as well as Ugaritic).

He did two year of doctoral-level course work in Semitic languages (Akkadian, Arabic, Ethiopic, Middle Egyptian, and Syriac) at Duke University. He received the Ph.D. in Old Testament Interpretation at Bob Jones University in 2005.

Since 1991, he has taught Hebrew and Old Testament at Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary, a school which serves primarily the Presbyterian Church in America and the Orthodox Presbyterian Church, where he holds the rank of Associate Professor.
 
adsfree-icon
Ads FreeProfile