Lectionary Calendar
Saturday, November 23rd, 2024
the Week of Proper 28 / Ordinary 33
the Week of Proper 28 / Ordinary 33
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
Attention!
Tired of seeing ads while studying? Now you can enjoy an "Ads Free" version of the site for as little as 10¢ a day and support a great cause!
Click here to learn more!
Click here to learn more!
Interlinear Study Bible
Hebrew Language
Hebrews 7:11
Antoniades Patriarchal Edition (1904/12)
ει μεν ουν τελειωσις δια της λευιτικης ιερωσυνης ην 5707 ο λαος γαρ επ αυτη νενομοθετητο 5718 τις ετι χρεια κατα την ταξιν μελχισεδεκ ετερον ανιστασθαι 5733 ιερεα και ου κατα την ταξιν ααρων λεγεσθαι 5745
Textus Receptus (Beza, 1598)
ει μεν ουν τελειωσις δια της λευιτικης ιερωσυνης ην ο λαος γαρ επ αυτη νενομοθετητο τις ετι χρεια κατα την ταξιν μελχισεδεκ ετερον ανιστασθαι ιερεα και ου κατα την ταξιν ααρων λεγεσθαι
Berean Greek Bible (2016)
οὖν Εἰ τελείωσις ἦν, μὲν διὰ τῆς Λευιτικῆς ἱερωσύνης γὰρ ἐπ’ αὐτῆς ὁ λαὸς νενομοθέτηται, τίς ἔτι χρεία ἕτερον ἱερέα ἀνίστασθαι λέγεσθαι; κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισέδεκ καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν
Byzantine/Majority Text (2000)
ει μεν ουν τελειωσις δια της λευιτικης ιερωσυνης ην ο λαος γαρ επ αυτη νενομοθετητο τις ετι χρεια κατα την ταξιν μελχισεδεκ ετερον ανιστασθαι ιερεα και ου κατα την ταξιν ααρων λεγεσθαι
Byzantine/Majority Text
ει μεν ουν τελειωσις δια της λευιτικης ιερωσυνης ην 5707 ο λαος γαρ επ αυτη νενομοθετητο 5718 τις ετι χρεια κατα την ταξιν μελχισεδεκ ετερον ανιστασθαι 5733 ιερεα και ου κατα την ταξιν ααρων λεγεσθαι 5745
Textus Receptus (Elzevir, 1624)
ει 5707 μεν ουν τελειωσις δια της λευιτικης ιερωσυνης ην ο 5718 λαος γαρ επ αυτη νενομοθετητο τις 5733 ετι χρεια κατα την ταξιν μελχισεδεκ ετερον ανιστασθαι ιερεα και ου κατα την ταξιν ααρων λεγεσθαι
Neste-Aland 26
Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευιτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν 5713 ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ αὐτῆς νενομοθέτηται 5769 τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισέδεκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι 5733 ἱερέα καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι 5745
SBL Greek New Testament (2010)
Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευιτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ αὐτῆς νενομοθέτηται τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισέδεκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι
Textus Receptus (Schrivener, 1894)
ει μεν ουν τελειωσις δια της λευιτικης ιερωσυνης ην ο λαος γαρ επ αυτη νενομοθετητο τις ετι χρεια κατα την ταξιν μελχισεδεκ ετερον ανιστασθαι ιερεα και ου κατα την ταξιν ααρων λεγεσθαι
Textus Receptus (Stephanus, 1550)
ει μεν ουν τελειωσις δια της λευιτικης ιερωσυνης ην ο λαος γαρ επ αυτη νενομοθετητο τις ετι χρεια κατα την ταξιν μελχισεδεκ ετερον ανιστασθαι ιερεα και ου κατα την ταξιν ααρων λεγεσθαι
Tischendorf 8th Edition (1869/72)
Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευειτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ’ αὐτῆς νενομοθέτηται τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισεδὲκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι
Textus Receptus (1550/1894)
εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς λευιτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν 5707 ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ᾽ αὐτῇ νενομοθέτητο 5718 τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν μελχισέδεκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι 5733 ἱερέα καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι 5745
Westcott / Hort, UBS4
ει μεν ουν τελειωσις δια της λευιτικης ιερωσυνης ην 5707 ο λαος γαρ επ αυτης νενομοθετηται 5769 τις ετι χρεια κατα την ταξιν μελχισεδεκ ετερον ανιστασθαι 5733 ιερεα και ου κατα την ταξιν ααρων λεγεσθαι 5745
Berean Study Bible
Now if perfection could have been attained - through the Levitical priesthood (for on this basis the people received the law), why was there still need for another priest to appearone in the order of Melchizedek and not in the order of Aaron?
Now if perfection could have been attained - through the Levitical priesthood (for on this basis the people received the law), why was there still need for another priest to appearone in the order of Melchizedek and not in the order of Aaron?
English Standard Version
Now if perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood for under it the people received the law what further need would there have been for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek rather than one named after the order of Aaron
Now if perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood for under it the people received the law what further need would there have been for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek rather than one named after the order of Aaron
Holman Christian Standard Version
If then, perfection came through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need was there for another priest to appear, said to be in the order of Melchizedek and not in the order of Aaron?
If then, perfection came through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need was there for another priest to appear, said to be in the order of Melchizedek and not in the order of Aaron?
King James Version
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law (5718),) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law (5718),) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
New American Standard Version
Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the Law), what further need {was there} for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be designated according to the order of Aaron?
Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the Law), what further need {was there} for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be designated according to the order of Aaron?
New Living Translation
So if the priesthood of Levi on which the law was based could have achieved the perfection God intended why did God need to establish a different priesthood with a priest in the order of Melchizedek instead of the order of Levi and Aaron
So if the priesthood of Levi on which the law was based could have achieved the perfection God intended why did God need to establish a different priesthood with a priest in the order of Melchizedek instead of the order of Levi and Aaron
World English Bible
Now if there were perfection (*) through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
Now if there were perfection (*) through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
