Bible Encyclopedias
Birkat ha-Minim

The 1901 Jewish Encyclopedia

Search for…

Enter query below:

or

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Prev Entry
Birds

Next Entry
Birkat Kohanim

Resource Toolbox

Print Article

Additional Links

Dictionaries
Chabad Knowledge Base
• Birkat Hamazon
• Birkat Hagomel
• Birkat Hachamah
Encyclopedias
The Jewish Encyclopedia
• Birkat Kohanim

The Three Groups.

Collection of benedictions forming the second—the see see Shema' being the first—important section of the daily prayers at the morning ("Shaḥarit"), afternoon ("Minḥah"), and evening ("'Arbit") services, as well as of the additional (MUSAF) service on Sabbaths and holy days. Literally, the name means "eighteen"; and its wide use shows that at the time it came into vogue the benedictions ("berakot") comprised in the prayer must have numbered eighteen, though in reality as fixed in the versions recited in the synagogues they number nineteen. As the prayer par excellence, it is designated as the "Tefillah" (prayer), while among the Sephardic Jews it is known as the "'Amidah," e., the prayer which the worshiper is commanded to recite standing (see also Zohar, 1:105). The eighteen—now nineteen—benedictions, according to their content and character, are readily grouped as follows: (1) three blessings of praise ("Shebaḥim," Nos. , , ); (2) twelve (now thirteen) petitions ("Baḳḳashot," Nos. - []), and (3) three concluding ones of thanks ("Hoda'ot," Nos. [], , and ). The first three and the last three constitute, so to speak, the permanent stock, used at every service; while the middle group varies on Sabbath, New Moons, and holy days from the formula for week-days. The construction of the "Shemoneh 'Esreh" complies with the rabbinical injunction that in every prayer the praises of God must precede private petitions ('Ab. Zarah 6), as the following comment shows: "In the first three [] man is like a slave chanting the praise of his master; in the middle sections [] he is a servant petitioning for his compensation from his employer; in the last three [] he is the servant who, having received his wages, takes leave of his master" (Ber. 34a).

No. of the first group is designated (R. H. 4:5) as "Abot" = "patriarchs," because the Patriarchs are mentioned, and the love of (or for) them is expressly emphasized therein. Translated, it reads as follows:

No. has the name "Geburot" (R. H. 4:5) = "powers," because it addresses God as the "Ba'al Geburot" and recites His powers, e., the resurrection of the dead and the sustentation of the living (comp. Gen. R. ). It is called also "Teḥiyyat ha-Metim" = "the resurrection of the dead." Rain is considered as great a manifestation of power as the resurrection of the dead (Ta'an. 2a); hence in winter a line referring to the descent of rain (Ber. 33a) is inserted in this benediction. The eulogy runs as follows:

No. is known as "Ḳedushshat ha-Shem" = "the sanctification of the Name." It is very short, though the variants are numerous (see below). It reads as follows:

At public worship, when the precentor, or, as he is known in Hebrew, the SHELIAḤ ẒIBBUR (messenger or deputy of the congregation) , repeats the prayer aloud, the preceding benediction (No. ), with the exception of the concluding sentence, "Blessed be Thou," etc., is replaced by the ḲEDUSHSHAH.

The Intermediate Blessings.

In work-day services the Shemoneh 'Esreh continues with Group 2 ("Baḳḳashot"), supplications referring to the needs of Israel (Sifre, Wezot ha-Berakah, ed. Friedmann, p. 142b).

No. , known, from its opening words, as "Attah Ḥonen," or, with reference to its content—a petition for understanding—as."Binah" (Meg. 17b), sometimes also as "BirkatḤokmah" (on account of the word "ḥokmah," now omitted, which occurred in the first phrase) and as "Birkat ha-Ḥol" = "work-day benediction" (Ber. 33a), reads as follows:

No. is known as "Teshubah" = "return" (Meg. 17b):

No. is the "Seliḥah," the prayer for forgiveness (Meg. 17b):

No. is styled "Birkat ha-Ge'ullah," the benediction ending with "Go'el" = "Redeemer" (Meg. 17b):

No. is the "Birkat ha-Ḥolim" ('Ab. Zarah 8a), or "Refu'ah" (Meg. 17b), the prayer for the sick or for recovery:

No. is the "Birkat ha-Shanim" (Meg. 17b), the petition that the year may be fruitful:

No. is the benediction in regard to the "Ḳibbuẓ Galuyot," the gathering of the Jews of the Diaspora (Meg. 17b):

No. is the "Birkat ha-Din," the petition for justice (Meg. 17b):

The Birkat ha-Minim.

No. is the "Birkat ha-Minim" or "ha-Ẓadduḳim" (Ber. 28b; Meg. 17b; Yer. Ber. ), the prayer against heretics and Sadducees (and traducers, informers, and traitors):

No. is a prayer in behalf of the "Ẓaddiḳim" = "pious" (Meg. 17b):

No. is a prayer in behalf of Jerusalem:

No. begins with "Et Ẓemaḥ Dawid" (Meg. 18a), and is so entitled. It is a prayer for the rise of David's sprout, e., the Messianic king. At one time it must have formed part of the preceding benediction (see below). It reads:

No. is denominated simply "Tefillah"= "prayer" (Meg. 18a). It is a supplication that the preceding prayers may be answered:

No. is termed the "'Abodah" = "sacrificial service" (Ber. 29b; Shab. 24a; R. H. 12a; Meg. 18a; Soṭah 38b; Tamid 32b):

No. is the "Hoda'ah" = a "confession" or "thanksgiving" (Meg. 18a; Ber. 29a, 34a; Shab. 24a; Soṭah 68b; also Articles of Faith):

Concluding Benedictions.

After this at public prayer in the morning the priestly blessing is added.

No. , however, is a résumé of this blessing. The benediction exists in various forms, the fuller one being used (in the German ritual) in the morning service alone (Meg. 18a), as follows:

The shorter form reads thus:

For the Sabbath, the middle supplications are replaced by one, so that the Sabbath "Tefillah" is composed of seven benedictions. This one speaks of the sanctity of the day (Ber. 29a; Yer. Ber. 4:3). It consists of an introductory portion, which on Sabbath has four different forms for the four services, and another short portion, which is constant:

On Sabbath-eve after the congregation has read the "Tefillah" silently, the reader repeats aloud the so-called "Me-'En Sheba'," or summary (Ber. 29, 57b; Pes. 104a) of the seven blessings (Shab. 24b; Rashi ad loc.). The reason given for this is the fear lest by tarrying too long or alone in the synagogue on the eve of the Sabbath the worshiper may come to harm at the hands of evil spirits. This abstract opens like No. , using, however, the words "Creator [Owner] of heaven and earth" where No. has "Creator of all," and omitting those immediately preceding "bestowest goodly kindnesses." The congregation then continues:

Then the reader concludes with the "Reẓeh," the middle Sabbath eulogy.

On festivals (even when coincident with the Sabbath) this "Sanctification of the Day" is made up of several sections, the first of which is constant and reads as follows:

Then follows a paragraph naming the special festival and its special character, and, if the Sabbath coincides therewith, it is mentioned before the feast. For Passover the wording is as follows:

Variations on Festivals.

For the other festivals the respective changes in the phrase printed above in italics are the following:

On New Moons and on the middle days of Pesaḥ or Sukkot, as well as on the holy days, the "Ya'aleh we-yabo" (= "Rise and come") is inserted in the "'Abodah," the name of the day appearing in each case in its proper place. The Sabbath is never referred to in this prayer, and it forms part of every service save the additional or Musaf:

In the final part of the benediction appears all introductory petition on the three joyous festivals:

Insertions.

On Rosh ha-Shanah a prayer for the coming of the kingdom of heaven is added at the close of this benediction (for its text see the prayer-books and Dembitz, c. p. 145). On the Day of Atonement the petition solicits pardon for sins (Dembitz, c. p. 146). A see HABDALAH is inserted on Saturday night in the "Sanctification of the Day" when a festival—and this can never happen with the Day of Atonement—falls on a Sunday. The form in use is somewhat longer than that given in the Talmud, where it is called "a pearl" on account of its sentiment (Ber. 33b; Beẓah 17a). Insertions are made in the six constant benedictions on certain occasions, as follows: During the ten days of Teshubah, e., the first ten days of Tishri, in No. , after "in love" is inserted "Remember us for life, O King who delightest in life, and inscribe us into the book of life; for Thy sake, O God of life"; in No. , after "salvation to sprout forth," "Who is like Thee, Father of mercies, who rememberest His [Thy] creatures unto life in mercy?"; in No. , "holy King," in place of "holy God" at the close; in No. , before the concluding paragraph, "O inscribe for a happy life all the sons of Thy covenant"; in No. , before the end, "May we be remembered and inscribed in the book of life, of blessing, of peace, and of good sustenance, we and all Thy people, the whole house of Israel, yea, for happy life and for peace"; and the close (in the German ritual) is changed to "Blessed be Thou, O Lord, who makest peace." In the "Ne'ilah" (concluding) service for the Day of Atonement, "inscribe" is changed to "seal." On the two "solemn days" ("Yamim Nora'im") a petition for the kingdom of heaven is inserted in No. (see the translation in Dembitz, c. p. 122), and the concludingphrase of this eulogy also is changed: "Thou art holy, and Thy name is fearful, and there is no God besides Thee, as it is written [Isaiah 5:16], 'The Lord God is exalted in judgment, and the Holy God is sanctified in righteousness.' Blessed be Thou, O Lord, the Holy King." In fall and winter, in No. , after the words "Thou resurrectest the dead and art great to save" is inserted the words: "Thou causest the wind to blow and the rain to descend." On New Moons and middle days, except in the Musaf, the "Ya'aleh we-yabo" (see above) is inserted in the "'Abodah" before "bring back." On Ḥanukkah and Purim special thanks are inserted in No. after the words "from everlasting we have hoped in Thee." These narrate the wonderful occurrences which the day recalls. On fast-days, after No. a special supplication is recited, beginning with "Answer us, O Lord, answer us"; and in No. , the prayer for the sick, one desirous of remembering a sick person interpolates a brief "Yehi Raẓon" (= "May it be Thy will") to that effect. On the Ninth of Ab in the Minḥah service a supplication is introduced into No. for the consolation of those that mourn for Zion. In No. , as well as in the Minḥah and the silent prayer, the fast-day appeal might be inserted.

The "Hoda'ah" (No. ) has a second version, styled the "Modim de-Rabbanan" and reading as follows:

As the title suggests, this is an anthology of various thanksgiving prayers composed by the Rabbis (Soṭah 9a). The close is not found in the Talmudical passage cited, nor does it appear in the "Siddur" of Rab Amram or in the formula given by Maimonides and others; but it is taken from Yer. Ber. 1:7. A somewhat different opening, "We confess and bow down and kneel," is preserved in the Roman Maḥzor.

Before the priestly blessing (originally in the morning service, but now in the additional service, and in the Minḥah service on the Ninth of Ab or on any other public fast-day), whenever "the priests" ("kohanim") are expected to recite the priestly blessing (DUKAN), the leader reads in the "'Abodah":

He then ends the benediction as usual and reads the "Modim" as well as the introduction to the priestly blessing (see BLESSING, PRIESTLY):

Thereupon they intone the blessing after the leader, word for word:

After each section the people usually answer, "Ken yehi raẓon!" (= "May such be [Thy] will!"); but when the kohanim perform this function (on the holy days) those present answer, "Amen." On the morning of the Ninth of Ab the kohanim may not pronounce the blessing, nor may the precentor read it.

Mode of Prayer.

The "Shemoneh 'Esreh" is first prayed silently by the congregation and then repeated by the reader aloud. In attitude of body and in the holding of the hands devotion is to be expressed (see Shulḥan 'Aruk, Oraḥ Ḥayyim, 95 et seq.). Interruptions are to be strictly avoided (ib. 104). In places and situations where there is grave danger of interruptions, a shorter form is permissible comprising the first three and the last three benedictions and between them only the "Attah Ḥonen," the petition for understanding (No.; Oraḥ Ḥayyim, 110).

The "Shemoneh 'Esreh" is prefaced by the verse "O Eternal, open my lips, and my mouth shall proclaim Thy praise" (Psalms 51:17; see Ber. 4b). At one time two other Biblical passages (Psalms 65:3 and Deuteronomy 32:3) were recited, one before and the other after the verse now retained. But this was considered to break the connection between the "Ge'ullah" (the preceding eulogy, the last in the "Shema'" ending with "Ga'al Yisrael") and the "Tefillah"; and such an interruption was deemed inadmissible, as even an "Amen" was not to be spoken before the words "O Eternal, open my lips," in order that this verse might be considered to belong to the preceding "Ge'ullah" and to form with it a "long Ge'ullah" (; Oraḥ Ḥayyim, 111; and the Ṭur, c.). A discussion arose among the later "Poseḳim" whether this injunction was applicable to Sabbaths and holy days or only to work-days. In the additional and Minḥah services more verses might be spoken after the "Shema'" and before and after the "Tefillah." The custom has gradually developed of reciting at the conclusion of the latter the supplication with which Mar, the son of Rabina, used to conclude his prayer (Ber. 17a):

At these words, three steps backward were taken (see Oraḥ Ḥayyim, c. 123), and then this was recited:

The Concluding Section.

Then followed a final phrase praying for the rebuilding of the Temple so that Israel might sacrifice again, to the sweet gratification of God as of yore. The worshiper was bidden to remain at the place whither his three backward steps had brought him for the space of time which would be required for traversing a space of four ells, or, if at public prayer-service, until the precentor, in the loud repetition, intoned the "Ḳedushshah."

In the "Tefillah" for the additional service the constant parts are always retained. On Rosh ha-Shanah there are three middle benedictions (according to R. H. 4:5; comp. Ta'an. 2:3 for fast-days): (1) "Fathers"; (2) "Powers"; (3) "Holiness of the Name" with addition of the "Kingdoms"; (4) "Sanctifications of the Day," the shofar being blown; (5) "Remembrances" (with shofar); (6) "Shofarot" (the shofar is blown); (7) "'Abodah"; (8) "Hoda'ot"; (9) Blessings of the kohanim. According to R. Akiba, "Kingdoms," e., verses recognizing God as king, must always go with "Blowings"; therefore he rearranges the benedictions as follows: (1), (2), (3) "Holiness"; (4) "Sanctifications" and "Kingdoms" (with blasts of the shofar); (5) "Remembrances," e., verses in which God is shown to be mindful of mankind and of Israel (with blasts); (6) "Shofarot," e., verses in which the shofar is named literally or figuratively; (7), (8), and (9). On Sabbaths and holy days there is only one middle benediction, an enlarged "Sanctification of the Day." The last part is modified on New Moon. If New Moon falls on a week-day, there is, of course, no "Sanctification of the Day"; but there is a special benediction, the introduction consisting of regrets for the cessation of the sacrifices, and the principal part of it being a petition for the blessing of the New Moon:

According to the German ritual, when Sabbath and New Moon coincide, the "Sanctification of the Day" is omitted; but a somewhat more impressive prayer is recited, referring to God's creation of the world, His completion thereof on the seventh day, His choice of Israel, and His appointment of Sabbaths for rest and New Moons for atonement; declaring that exile is the punishment for sins of the fathers; and supplicating for the restoration of Israel.

On an ordinary Sabbath the middle benediction, in a labored acrostic composition in the inverted order of the alphabet, recalls the sacrifices ordained for the Sabbath, and petitions for restoration in order that Israel may once more offer the sacrifices as prescribed, the prayer concluding with an exaltation of the Sabbath. In the festival liturgy the request for the restoring of the sacrificial service emphasizes still more the idea that the Exile was caused by "our sins" ("umi-pene ḥaṭa'enu"):

On the three pilgrim festivals another supplication for the rebuilding of the Temple is added to the foregoing, with quotation of the Pentateuchal injunction (Deuteronomy 16:16,17) regarding appearance before God on those days.

The additional for the middle days (the workdays) of Pesaḥ and Sukkot is the same as that for the feasts proper, and is read even on the Sabbath.

The following are some of the more important variants in the different rituals:

Variants in the Rituals.

In No. ("Lead us back, our Father," etc.) Saadia, Maimonides, and the Italian Maḥzor read "Lead us back, our Father, to Thy Torah, through our clinging to Thy commandments, and bring us near," etc.

The Sephardim shorten the last benediction in the evening and morning services of the Ninth of Ab to this brief phrasing:

In No. (the benediction for the year) the words "dew and rain" are inserted during the term from the sixtieth day after the autumnal equinox to Passover. The Sephardic ritual has two distinct versions: one for the season when dew is asked for, and the other when rain is expected. The former has this form:

In the rainy season (in winter) the phraseology is changed to read:

In No. the Sephardic ritual introduces before "the elders" the phrase "and on the remnant of Thy people, the house of Israel," while in some editions these words are entirely omitted, and before the conclusion this sentence is inserted: "on Thy great loving-kindness in truth do we rely for support."

No. among the Sephardim reads:

This reading is that of Maimonides, while the Ashkenazim adopted that of Rab Amram.

In No. God is addressed as "Ab ha-Raḥman" = "the Merciful Father." Before the conclusion is inserted "Be gracious unto us and answer us and hear our prayer, for Thou hearest the prayer of every mouth" (the "'Aruk," under , gives this reading: "Full of mercy art Thou. Blessed be Thou who hearest prayer"). In the "Reẓeh" (No. ) the text differs somewhat: "Be pleased . . . with Thy people Israel [as in the German ritual] and to their prayer give heed"—a reading presented by Maimonides also. Furthermore, the word "meherah" (= "speedily") is introduced as qualifying the expected answer to the prayer and the offerings. Amram has this adverb; but MaHaRIL objects to its insertion.

Verbal changes, not materially affecting the meaning, occur also in the "Ya'aleh we-Yabo" (for New Moons, etc.). But before "May our eyes behold" the Sephardim insert "and Thou in Thy great mercy ["wilt" or "dost"] take delight in us and show us favor," while Saadia Gaon adds before the conclusion ("Blessed be," etc.): "and Thou wilt take delight in us as of yore."

Slight verbal modifications are found also in the Sephardic "Hoda'ah"; e.g., "and they [the living] shall praise and bless Thy great name in truth forever; for good [is] the God, our help and our aid, Selah, the God, the Good." Abudarham quotes, "and Thy name be exalted constantly and forever and aye"; while Saadia's version reads: "on account of all, be Thou blessed and exalted; for Thou art the Only One in the universe, and there is none besides Thee." The Roman Maḥzor inserts before "and for all these" the following: "Thou hast not put us to shame, O Eternal our God, and Thou hast not hidden Thy face from us." And so in the final benediction—for which the Sephardim always use the formula beginning with "Sim shalom," never that with "Shalom rab"—among the blessings asked for is included that for "much strength," one not found in the German ritual. Maimonides and Amram likewise do not use the formula beginning with the words "Shalom rab." Following Amram, Saadia, and Maimonides, the Sephardim read: "Torah and life, love and kindness" where the German ritual presents the construct case: "Torah of life and love of kindness."

In the Intermediate Blessings.

Moreover, in the Sephardic ritual a number of individual petitions are admitted in various benedictions, which is not the case in the Ashkenazic. In the introduction to the "Sanctification of the Day" (benediction No. ) for the Sabbath the Sephardim add on Friday evening lines which the Ashkenazim include only in the additional service (see Dembitz, c. p. 141). For the middle benediction of the Musaf the Sephardim have a simpler form (ib. p. 149). While the Germans quote in the prayer the language of the Pentateuch in reference to the sacrifices, the Sephardim omit it. In praying for the new month the Portuguese ritual adds: "May this month be the last of all our troubles, a beginning of our redemption." (For differences in the Musaf for Sabbath and New Moon see Dembitz, c. p. 153.)

In the Vitry Maḥzor's reading the conjunction "waw" is frequently dropped, much to the improvement of the diction. In benediction No. God is addressed as "Maẓmiaḥ Lanu Yeshu'ah," "causing salvation to sprout forth 'for us'"; while in No. the prefixing of the definite article to the adjective gives the context a new significance, viz., not "Thy name is holy," but "Thy name is 'the Holy One.'" In No. the word "ḥokmah" is presented in addition to "binah" and "de'ah," e., "understanding, knowledge, wisdom, and reason." In No. the Vitry, Maḥzor has "a God good and forgiving art Thou" instead of "pardoning and forgiving," thus conforming with the readings of Amram, Maimonides, and the Roman Maḥzor.

In No. after "our wounds" follows "our sicknesses." In No. for "Blow the great shofar" this version reads "Gather us from the four corners of all the earth into our land," which is found also in the Sephardic ritual and in Amram and Maimonides.

No. is presented as in the Sephardic form (see above), but with the addition:

So, also, Saadia: "and Thou wilt be pleased with us as of yore." The "Modim" is given in an abbreviated form; and in the last benediction the words "on every day" are inserted before "at all times."

A great variety of readings is preserved in the case of benediction No. In the Roman Maḥzor the phraseology is: "From generation to generation we shall proclaim God King, for He alone is exalted and holy; and Thy praise, O our God, shall not depart from our mouth forever and aye, for a God great and holy art Thou. Blessed be Thou, O Eternal, the holy God." This is also Amram's language; but in Saadia's ritual is presented: "Thou art holy and Thy name is holy, and Thy memorial ["zeker"] is holy, and Thy throne is holy, and the holy ones every day will praise Thee, Selah. Blessed be Thou, God, the Holy One." Maimonides confirms this version, though he omits the words "Thy memorial is holy . . . and Thy throne is holy." In Sifre, Deut. 343 this benediction is quoted as "Holy art Thou and awe-inspiring Thy name," which is the Ashkenazic reading for Rosh ha-Shanah and the Day of Atonement.

No. , "Tefillat Ta'anit," the prayer for fast-days (Ta'an. 11b, 13b), has come down in various recensions. In the "'Aruk," under , the reading is as follows:

The formula given by Maimonides differs from this, as it does from those in vogue among the Ashkenazim and the Sephardim respectively, which in turn disagree with each other. Maimonides has this reading:

When, however, the reader repeated the prayer aloud, between and , on reaching "for Thou dost hear," etc., he substituted "Thou art a God answering in time of trouble, ransoming and saving in all time of trouble and tribulation. Blessed be Thou, O Eternal, who answerest in time of trouble." The Sephardic recension has the following:

The German ritual adds: "do not hide Thy face from us"; and again: "May Thy loving-kindness be [shown] to console us."

The petition for healing (No. ) appears with altered expressions in the Sephardic ritual, the words for "healing" being the unusual "arukah" and "marpe." Again, "our sicknesses" takes the place of "our sores or wounds." So, also, in Maimonides' ritual, which moreover after the added "and all our pains" has "for a God [omitting "King"] healing, merciful, and trustworthy art Thou."

On the whole the language of the eighteen (nineteen) benedictions is Biblical, and in phraseology is more especially similar to that of the Psalms. The following analysis may indicate the Biblical passages underlying the "Tefillah":

Biblical Sources.

• Benediction No. : "Blessed be Thou, our God and the God of our fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob" recalls Exodus 3:15 (comp. Mek., Bo, 16). "The high God," Genesis 14:19. God "great, mighty, and awe-inspiring," Deuteronomy 10:17 (comp. Ber. 33b; Soṭah 69b). "Creator of all," Genesis 14:19. "Bringing a redeemer," Isaiah 59:20. "Shield of Abraham," Psalms 7:11; 18:3,36; 84:10; Genesis 15:1.
• No. : "Supportest the falling," Psalms 145:14. "Healest the sick," Exodus 15:26. "Settest free the captives," Psalms 146:7. "Keepest his faith" = "keepeth truth forever," ib. 146:6 (comp. Daniel 12:2). "Killing and reviving," 1 Samuel 2:6.
• No. : "Thou art holy," Psalms 22:4. "The holy ones," ib. 16:3. "[They shall] praise Thee" = sing the "Hallel" phrase, which is a technical Psalm term and hence followed by Selah.
• No. : "Thou graciously vouchsafest" is a typical Psalm idiom, the corresponding verb occurring perhaps more than 100 times in the psalter. "Understanding," Isaiah 29:23; Jeremiah 3:15; Psalms 94:10.
• No. : "Repentance," Isaiah 6:10,13; 55:7.
• No. : "Pardon," ib. 55:7.
• No. : "Behold our distress," Psalms 9:14, 25:18, 109:153. "Fight our fight," ib. 35:1, 43:1, 74:22. "And redeem us," ib. 109:154 (comp. Lamentations 3:58).
• No. : "Heal," Jeremiah 17:14 (comp. ib. 30:17). Maimonides' reading, "all of our sicknesses," is based on Psalms 103:3.
• No. : Compare ib. 65:5,12; 103:5; Jeremiah 31:14.
• No. : "Gather our exiles," Isaiah 11:12, 27:13, 43:5, 45:20, 60:9; Jeremiah 51:27; Deuteronomy 30:4; Mic. 4:6; Psalms 147:2.
• No. : "Reestablish our judges," Isaiah 1:26. "In loving-kindness and mercy," Hosea 2:21. "King who lovest righteousness and justice," Psalms 33:5, 99:4; Isaiah 61:8 (comp. also Isaiah 35:10, 51:11; Psalms 146:10).
• No. : The expression "zedim" is a very familiar one of almost technical significance in the "Psalms of the poor" (for other expressions compare Psalms 81:15; Isaiah 25:5).
• No. : For some of the words of this benediction compare Jeremiah 31:20; Isaiah 63:15; Psalms 22:6, 25:2, 71:5, 143:8; Ecclesiastes 6:9.
• No. : Zechariah 8:3; Psalms 147:2, 89:36-37, 122:5.
• No. : Hosea 3:5; Isaiah 56:7; Ps. 23, 112:9; Genesis 49:18; Psalms 89:4,18,21,26; 25:5; Ezekiel 29:21, 34:23; Psalms 132:17; Jeremiah 23:5, 33:15; Psalms 132:10.
• No. : Psalms 65:3.
• No. : Mic. 4:11.
• No. : 1 Chronicles 29:13; 2 Samuel 22:36; Psalms 79:13; Lamentations 3:22; Psalms 38:6 (on the strength of which was printed the emendation "Ha-Mufḳadot" for the "Ha-Peḳudot"); Jeremiah 10:6.
• No. : Psalms 29:10; Numbers 6:27; Mic. 6:8; Psalms 109:165, 125:5.

Mishnaic Phraseology.

While in the main the language is Biblical, yet some use is made of mishnaic words; for example, "teshubah," as denoting "repentance," and the hif'il "hasheb" have a synonym, "we-ha-ḥazir" (in No. ), in which sense the root is not found in Biblical Hebrew. The expression "meḥal" (vocalized "meḥol") is altogether mishnaic (Yoma 7:1; Ket. 17a; Ber. 28a; Shab. 30a; Ta'an. 20b; Sanh. 107a). "Nissim," for "wonders," "miracles," has a significance which the Biblical word "nes" does not possess (Ab.; Ber. 9:1; Niddah 31a). So also the term "sha'ah," an adaptation from the Aramaic, occurs as the equivalent of the Hebrew "rega'" = "moment" (secondarily, "hour"). "Peleṭat soferim" is a rabbinical designation (Meg. Ta'an.; Yer. Ta'an. 66a), while "ḥerut" = "freedom" is another late Hebrew term. "Gere ha-ẓedeḳ" is the late technical term for see Proselytes.

The language of the "Tefillah" would thus point to the mishnaic period, both before and after the destruction of the Temple, as the probable time of its composition and compilation. That the Mishnah fails to record the text or to give other definite and coherent directions concerning the prayer except sporadically, indicates that when the Mishnah was finally compiled the benedictions were so well known that it was unnecessary to prescribe their text andcontent (Maimonides on Men. 4:1b, quoted by Elbogen, "Gesch. des Achtzehngebetes"), although the aversion to making prayer a matter of rigor and fixed formula may perhaps have had a part in the neglect of the Mishnah. That this aversion continued keen down to a comparatively late period is evidenced by the protests of R. Eliezer (Ber. 28a) and R. Simeon ben Yoḥai (Ab. 2:13). R. Jose held that one should include something new in one's prayer every day (Yer. Ber. 8b), a principle said to have been carried into practise by R. Eleazar and R. Abbahu (ib.). Prayer was not to be read as one would read a letter (ib.).

While the Mishnah seems to have known the general content and sequence of the benedictions, much latitude prevailed as regards personal deviations in phraseology, at all events; so that men's learning or the reverse could be judged by the manner in which they worded the benedictions (Tos. to Ber. 1:7).

Preserved by Memory.

Prayers were not reduced to writing (Shab. 115b; Yer. Shab. 15c). Not until the times of the Masseket Soferim were written prayer-manuals in existence (see Zunz, "Ritus," p. 11). Hence the necessity of resorting to mnemonic verses in order to prevent too much variety—a method employed even by very late authorities. For instance, the "Ṭur" gives the verse Isaiah 6:3, containing fourteen words, as a reminder that benediction No. contains the same number of words. For No. , Exodus 28:3 is the reminder that only seventeen words (excluding "ḥokmah") are admissible. The number of words in No. , namely, fifteen, is recalled by the similar number of words in Isaiah 55:7 or ib. 6:13, which proves the correctness of the German text.

The "Kol Bo" states that No. has eighteen words, as has the verse Exodus 16:25; and this would justify the insertion of the word "Na" (), which appears in some versions. The "Roḳeaḥ," however, reports only seventeen words, as in the German version. No. has twenty-seven words, corresponding to the same number in Exodus 16:26 or in the verse concerning circumcision (Genesis 17), or to the twenty-seven letters of Proverbs 4:22 or Psalms 103:3. This list of correspondences in the number of words or letters, invoked by the very late authorities to settle disputed readings, might be extended, as such analogy is assigned to almost every benediction (see Baer's commentary in his "Seder 'Abodat Israel." pp. 89 et seq.).

Choice of the Number Eighteen.

The earlier Talmudic teachers resorted to similar aids in order to fix the number of the benedictions contained in the "Tefillah." The choice of eighteen is certainly a mere accident; for at one time the collection contained less, and at another more, than that number. The fact that such mnemonic verses came into vogue suggests that originally the number of the benedictions was not definitely fixed; while the popularity of the verses fixing the number as eighteen is probably caused by the continued designation of the prayer as the "Shemoneh 'Esreh," though it now has nineteen benedictions (according to "J. Q. R." 14:585, the Yemen "Siddur" has the superscription. " Nineteen Benedictions"). Eighteen corresponds to the eighteen times God's name is mentioned in Psalms 29 (Yer. Ber. 8a, above; Lev. R. ), which psalm, nevertheless, seems to indicate the number of benedictions as nineteen (see Elbogen, c.; "Monatsschrift," 1902, p. 353). Another mnemonic reference, based upon the number of times the names of the three Patriarchs occur together in the Pentateuch (Gen. R. ), is resorted to, and points to the fact that at one time seventeen benedictions only were counted.

Other bases of computations of the number eighteen are: (1) the eighteen times God's name is referred to in the "Shema'"; (2) the eighteen great hollows in the spinal column (Ber. 28b); (3) the eighteen psalms at the beginning of the Book of Psalms (- being really only; Yer. Ber. ); (4) the eighteen "commands" which are in the pericope "Peḳude" (Exodus 38:21 et seq.); (5) the eighteen names of Yhwh in Miriam's song by the sea (Exodus 15). These mnemonic references suggest the fact that originally the number was not eighteen; otherwise the pains taken to associate this number with other eighteens would be inexplicable.

History of the Prayer.

The Talmud names Simeon ha-Paḳoli as the editor of the collection in the academy of R. Gamaliel II. at Jabneh. (Ber. 28b). But this can not mean that the benedictions were unknown before that date; for in other passages the "Shemoneh 'Esreh" is traced to the "first wise men" ( ; Sifre, Deut. 343), and again to "120 elders and among these a number of prophets" (Meg. 17b). This latter opinion harmonizes with the usual assumption that the "men of the Great Synagogue" arranged and instituted the prayer services (Ber.33a). In order to remove the discrepancies between the latter and the former assignment of editorship, the Talmud takes refuge in the explanation that the prayers had fallen into disuse, and that Gamaliel reinstituted them (Meg. 18a).

Edited by Gamaliel II.

The historical kernel in these conflicting reports seems to be the indubitable fact that the benedictions date from the earliest days of the Pharisaic Synagogue. They were at first spontaneous outgrowths of the efforts to establish the Pharisaic Synagogue in opposition to, or at least in correspondence with, the Sadducean Temple service. This is apparent from the haggadic endeavor to connect the stated times of prayer with the sacrificial routine of the Temple, the morning and the afternoon "Tefillah" recalling the constant offerings (Ber. 26b; Gen. R. ), while for the evening "Tefillah" recourse was had to artificial comparison with the sacrificial portions consumed on the altar during the night. In certain other homilies the fixation of the day's periods for the three "Tefillot" is represented as being in harmony with the daily course of the sun (Gen. R.; R. Samuel bar Naḥman, in Yer. Ber. ). Again, the Patriarchs are credited with having devised this tripartite scheme (Ber. 26b; Abraham = morning; Isaac = afternoon; Jacob = evening). Daniel 6:11 is the proof that this system of praying three times a day was recognized in the Maccabean era. Gradually both the hours for the "Tefillah" and the formulas thereof acquiredgreater regularity, though much uncertainty as to content, sequence, and phraseology continued to prevail. R. Gamaliel II. undertook finally both to fix definitely the public service and to regulate private devotion. He directed Simeon ha-Paḳoli to edit the benedictions—probably in the order they had already acquired—and made it a duty, incumbent on every one, to recite the prayer three times daily. Under Gamaliel, also, another paragraph, directed against the traitors in the household of Israel, was added, thus making the number eighteen (Ber. 4:3; see Grätz, "Gesch." 3d ed., 4:30 et seq.).

Old material is thus preserved in the eighteen benedictions as arranged and edited by the school of Gamaliel II. The primitive form of most of them was undoubtedly much simpler. J. Derenbourg (in "R. E. J." 14:26 et seq.) makes two facts appear plausible:

1. While recited in the Temple, the original conclusion of benedictions was "Blessed be Thou, O Eternal, God of Israel from eternity to eternity" (Ber. 9:5; Geiger, in "Kerem Ḥemed," 5:102; idem, "Lehr- und Lesebuch zur Sprache der Mischnah," 2:2;"He-Ḥaluẓ," 7:88), emphasizing the "other eternity or world" denied by heretics. From this is derived the usual designation of God as "King of the world," not found, strange to say, in the eighteen benedictions—a circumstance that attracted the attention of the Rabbis (Ber. 29a). This omission might indicate that the bulk of the benedictions received something like their present form under the supremacy of the Romans, who did not tolerate the declaration "God is king." More likely is the explanation that the omission was for the purpose of avoiding the misconstruction that God ruled only over this world. In the Rosh ha-Shanah prayer the thought of God's rulership is all the more strongly emphasized; and this fact suggests that the Rosh ha-Shanah interpolations are posterior to the controversies with the Jewish heretics and the Romans, but not to the time when Christianity's Messianic theology had to be answered by affirmations of the Jewish teaching that God alone is king. The word , wherever found in the text, is a later insertion. So also is the phrase = "in love," which also carries an anti-Pauline point (see Epistle of Paul to the Romans).
2. In the middle, non-constant benedictions (Nos. ) there is a uniform structure; namely, they contain two parallel stichoi and a third preceding the "Blessed be" of the "sealing" (as the Rabbis call it) of the benediction; for example, in No. are: (1) "Thou graciously vouchsafest knowledge to man" = (2) "and teachest mortals understanding"; and (3) "Vouchsafe unto us from Thee knowledge, understanding, and intelligence." By this test the later enlargements are easily separated from the original stock.In the "sealing" formula, too, later amplifications are found. It was always composed of two words and no more, as in Nos. , , , and of the present text; so No. originally, read ; No. , ; and the others similarly.

The Abstracts.

The abstracts of the benedictions (Ber. 29a) which R. Joshua (ib. 28b) recommended, and Rab and Samuel explained, so that the last-named has come to be considered as the author of a résumé of this kind (ib. 29a), indicate that primarily the longer eulogies were at least not popular. Abaye (4th cent.) found the fondness for these abstracts so strong that he pronounced a curse upon those who should use them (ib.). In the time of R. Akiba the knowledge of the eighteen benedictions was not yet universal; for he advised that one who was familiar with the prayer should recite it, and that one who was not might discharge his duty by reciting a résumé (ib. 28b). In dangerous places a very brief formula was, according to R. Joshua, substituted: "Help, O Eternal, Thy people, the remnant of Israel. May their needs at all the partings of the roads be before Thee. Blessed be Thou, O Lord, who hearest prayer" (Ber. 4:3). The following brief prayer, attributed to R. Eliezer, is for use in places where wild animals and robbers may be prowling about: "Thy will be done in heaven above, and bestow ease of mind upon them that fear Thee [on earth] below, and what is good in Thine eyes execute. Blessed be Thou, O Eternal, who hearest prayer" (ib. 29b). R. Joshua recommended this formula: "Hear the cry of Thy people Israel, and do speedily according to their petition. Blessed be Thou, O Eternal, who hearest prayer." R. Eliezer, the son of R. Zadok, virtually repeated the preceding, with merely the substitution of a synonym for "cry." Others used this form: "The needs of Thy people Israel are many, and their knowledge is scarce [limited]. May it be a pleasure from before Thee, O Eternal, our God, to vouchsafe unto each sufficiency of sustenance and to each and every one enough to satisfy his wants. Blessed be Thou, O Eternal, who hearest prayer" (ib.). This last form came to be officially favored (ib.).

That, even after the "Tefillah" had been fixed as containing eighteen (nineteen) benedictions, the tendency to enlarge and embellish their content remained strong, may be inferred from the admonition not to exaggerate further God's praises (Meg. 18a); or, as R. Johanan has it: "Whoever exaggerates the laudations of the Holy One—praised be He!—will be uprooted from the world" (ib.). R. Ḥanina took occasion to reprove very severely a reader who added attribute to attribute while addressing the Deity. If the "men of the Great Synagogue" had not inserted the qualifications "great, mighty, and awe-inspiring," none would dare repeat them (Meg. 25a; Ber. 33b; AGNOSTICISM). Provisions were made to silence readers who should indulge their fancy by introducing innovations (Ber. 33b), especially such as were regarded with suspicion as evincing heretical leanings.

The abstracts, however, throw light on what may have been the number of the benedictions before Gamaliel fixed it at eighteen by addition of the petition for the punishment of traitors ("wela-malshinim") The Babylonian Talmud has preserved one version; Yerushalmi, another (or two: a longer and a briefer form, of which the fragments have been combined; see J. Derenbourg in "R. E. J." 14:32).These abstracts, known as the "Habinenu" from their first word, were intended to replace benedictions Nos. - The Babylonian text reads as follows:

An examination of the phraseology establishes the concordance of this abstract and the "Shemoneh 'Esreh" as in the prayer-books.

The Fifteenth Benediction.

The Palestinian text (Yer. Ber. ) reveals the contraction of two blessings into one. "Give us understanding, O Eternal, our God [= No. ], and be pleased with our repentance [= ]; pardon us, O our Redeemer [-], and heal our sick [= ], bless our years with dews of blessing []; for the dispersed Thou wilt gather [], they who err against Thee to be [will be] judged []; but upon the evil-doers thou wilt lay Thy hand [], and they who trust in Thee will rejoice [] in the rebuilding of Thy city and in the restoration of Thy sanctuary []. Before we call Thou wilt answer []. Blessed be Thou, O Eternal, who answerest prayer." From this it appears that No. ("the sprout of David") is omitted; it was not regarded as an independent benediction, but formed part of the one preceding. According to this, seventeen was the number of benedictions without the "Birkat ha-Ẓadduḳim." That this was the case originally is evidenced by other facts. In Yer. Ber. 4:5, R. H. 4:6, Midr. Teh. to Psalms 29 (ed. Buber, p. 232), and Midr. Shemu'el. the "sealing" of benediction No. is quoted as "Blessed be Thou, O Eternal, the God of David, and the builder of Jerusalem," indicating that Nos. and formed only one benediction. In support of this is the notation of what now is No. as No. (Yer. Ber. 2:4; Gen. R. ). Again: (1) In Yer. Ber. 2:4, 4:3, and Ta'an. 2:2, the Tosef., Ber. 3:25 is quoted as reporting the inclusion of the "David" benediction in that concerning the rebuilding of Jerusalem. (2) In the account by Yer. Ber. 4d of the order in which the benedictions follow each other, the benediction concerning David is not mentioned. (3) In many of Ḳalir's compositions—still used in the Italian ritual—for Purim, Hosha'na Rabbah, the Seventeenth of Tammuz, and the Tenth of Ṭebet, in which he follows the sequence of the "Tefillah," this No. is not found (Rapoport, in "Bikkure ha-'Ittim," , notes 28, 33). Additional indications that Nos. and were originally one are found in "Halakot Gedolot" (Ber. ), "Sefer ha-Eshkol" ("Tefillah," etc., ed. Auerbach, p. 20), and Midr. Leḳaḥ Ṭob on Deuteronomy 3:23.

But in Babylon this contraction was deemed improper. The question, put into the mouth of David (Sanh. 107a), why God is called the God of Abraham but not the God of David, suggests the elimination of "Elohe Dawid" from benediction No. In Babylon Nos. and were counted as two distinct blessings. But this division seems to have been later than the introduction of the prayer against the traitors by Gamaliel (see Pes. 107a, 117b; Tan., Wayera [ed. Buber, p. 42]: "in Babel they recite nineteen"), though Rapoport ("'Erek Millin," p. 228b), Müller ("Ḥillufim," p. 47), and others hold, to the contrary, that the contraction (in Palestine) of Nos. and was a contrivance to retain the traditional number eighteen, which had been enlarged by the addition of one under Gamaliel II. Which of the two views is the more plausible it is difficult to decide.

Haggadic Explanation of Sequence.

At all events, the sequence in the existing arrangement is logical. The midrashic explanation connects it with events in the lives of the Patriarchs. When Abraham was saved the angels recited the "Blessed be Thou . . . shield of Abraham" (No.; Pirḳe R. El. ); when Isaac was saved by the substitution of the ram they chanted ". . . reviving the dead" (No.; Pirḳe R. El. ); when Jacob touched the gate of heaven they intoned ". . . the holy God" (No.; Pirḳe R. El. ); and when Pharaoh raised Joseph to the dignity of viceroy and Gabriel came to teach him the seventy languages, the angels recited ". . . vouchsafing knowledge" (No.; comp. Pirḳe R. El. , where Moses calls forth the benediction by receiving the knowledge of God's ineffable name). No. was spoken over Reuben and Bilhah (or when Manasseh the king repented; ib. ). No. refers to Judah and Tamar; No. to Israel's deliverance from Egypt; No. was first sung at Abraham's recovery, through Raphael's treatment, from the pain of circumcision; No. refers to Isaac's planting and plowing; No. to Jacob's reunion with his family in Egypt; No. to Israel's receiving the Law ("Mishpaṭim"); No. to Egypt's undoing in the Red Sea; No. to Joseph's tender closing of Jacob's eyes; No. to Solomon's building of the Temple; No. to Israel's salvation at the Red Sea; No. to Israel's distress and ever-present help; No. to the establishment of the Tabernacle ("Shekinah"); No. to Solomon's bringing the Ark into the inner sanctuary; No. to the Israelites' conquest of the land after which they had peace.

Why No. follows upon No. is explained in Meg. 17b by a reference to Isaiah 29:23; why the "Teshubah" immediately succeeds the "Binah," by a reference to Isaiah 6:10. Again, upon the "Teshubah," repentance, follows the "Seliḥah," pardon, in keeping with Isaiah 55:7. The "Ge'ullah," redemption, should be the seventh benediction (Meg. 17b) because redemption will take place on the seventh day, or rather, as stated by the "Cuzari" and the "Ṭur," because the result of forgiveness is redemption. No. treats of healing because the eighth day is for circumcision (Meg. 17b). No. follows No. so as to harmonize with Ezekiel 36:8 (Meg. 17b). As soon as the dispersed (No. ) are gathered, judgment (No. ) will be visited on the evil-doers as stated in Isaiah 1:26 (Meg. 17b); and when this hastaken place all treason (No. ) will cease (Ber. 28b; Meg. 17b; Yer. Ber. ). As the traitors are mentioned, the righteous (No. ) naturally are suggested; and their triumph is assured by the downfall of the wicked (Psalms 70:11; Meg. c.). The immediate outcome of this triumph is the resurrection of Jerusalem (No.; Psalms 122:6; Meg. c.) and the reenthronement of David's house (No.; Hosea 3:5; Isaiah 56:7; Ps. 23; Meg. 18a). The connection between the last benediction and the priestly blessing is established (Meg. 18a) by Numbers 6:27 and Psalms 29:11.

The Age of the Concluding Benedictions.

The last three benedictions seem to be the oldest of the collection. The names of Nos. and ("'Abodah" and "Hoda'ah") occur in the liturgy for the high priest for the Day of Atonement as described in the Mishnah (Yoma 7:1). It goes without saying that parts of the present text of No. could not have been used before the destruction of the Temple. But in Yer. Yoma 44b is given a concluding formula almost identical with that now used on holy days when the blessing is recited by the kohanim (; in Yer. Soṭah 22a, and in the commentary of R. Hananeel on Yoma c., the reading is: ), while in the "Hoda'ah" the ending is almost as now, = "Thou, the one to whom it is good to give thanks." The last three and the first three blessings were included in the daily prayer of the priests (Tamid , 5:1; see Grätz, c. 2d ed., 2:187, note 4). Zunz ("G. V." 2d ed., p. 380) would assign these to the days of the high priest Simeon. These six are also mentioned by name in an old mishnah (R. H. 4:5). This would support the assumption that the motive of the early Synagogue was antisacerdotal. The very prayers used in the Temple service by the high priest in the most solemn function were taken over into the Synagogue with the implication that this "'Abodah" was as effective as was the sacerdotal ritual. The function of blessing the people the Pharisees would not and could not arrogate unto themselves. Instead they adopted or composed the "Sim Shalom," known as the "Birkat Kohanim" (priestly blessing), and therefore equivalent to the "lifting up of the priest's hands" (for these terms see Maimonides and RaBaD on Tamid 5:1; and Ta'an. 4:1; Tamid 7:2; Ber. 5:4).

The "Psalms of the Poor."

The affinity, noticed by Loeb (in "R. E. J." 19:17), of the "Shemoneh 'Esreh" with the "psalms of the poor" is in keeping with the Pharisaic-Ḥasidic emphasis of the benedictions. The "pious and poor" of the Psalms were the ideal types which the Pharisees sought to imitate. The palpable emphasis of No. on the resurrection (hence one of its names, "Teḥiyyat ha-Metim"; Ber. 5:2; Ta'an. 2a) confirms this theory. The expressions used in this blessing are Biblical (see Loeb in "R. E. J." ). The doctrine of the resurrection is intimately connected with Pharisaic nationalism. The anti-Sadducean protest in this benediction is evident.

Of the middle benedictions, No. , the blessing for the year, discloses a situation such as prevailed before the disruption of the state, when agriculture was the chief occupation of the Jews. It must for this reason be credited with being one of the oldest parts of the "Tefillah." Nos. and are not specific in content. The latter is a good summary of the petitions (comp. that of the high priest in Yoma 70a and Yer. Yoma 44b), while No. , more than any other, is characteristic of a religion in which understanding is considered essential to piety. The importance of this petition was recognized at an early date. R. Judah ha-Nasi desired to have it used on the Sabbath as well as on week-days (Yer. Ber. 5:2: "if no understanding, whence prayer?"). This passion for knowledge also was characteristic of Pharisaism. The prayer for the sick may perhaps likewise be assigned among the older portions (see Elbogen, c. p. 341).

In its earlier composition, then, the "Tefillah" seems to have comprised Nos. i, , , , , , , , and The other benedictions are altogether of a national content. None of them may be assigned to a date before the Maccabean era, while for many a later one is suggested by the content. But the prayer found in Ecclus. (Sirach) should be kept in mind, as it proves that prayers for Jerusalem, and even for the Temple, were not unusual while both were still standing. The original meaning of the prayer against enemies is perhaps also apparent in this chapter:

• Verse 1. "Save us, God of all, and lift up Thy fear upon all the nations."
• Verse 2. "Swing on high the hand against the strange people and let them behold Thy might."
• Verse 3. "As before their eyes Thou wert proved the Holy One in us, so before our eyes be Thou glorified in them."
• Verse 4. "And they shall know as we do know that there is no God besides Thee."
• Verse 5. "Renew signs and repeat miraculous deeds. Lift up in glory hand and right arm."
• Verse 6. "Summon wrath and pour out glowing anger. Hurl back the adversary and humiliate the enemy."
• Verse 7. "Gather all the tribes of Jacob and do Thou cause them to inherit as of old."
• Verse 8. "Make glad the people called by Thy name, Israel Thou namedst the first-born."
• Verse 9. "Have mercy on Thy holy city, Jerusalem, the place of Thy dwelling."
• Verse 10. "Fill Zion with Thy splendor and with Thy glory Thy Temple."
• Verse 11. "Hear the prayer of Thy servants like the blessing of Aaron upon Thy people."

This has the appearance of being an epitome of the "Tefillah" as known in the days of Ben Sira.

Analogies in Sirach.

• Verse 1: "God of all" recalls benediction No. , while 1b is the key-note of the prayer for Rosh ha-Shanah.
• Verse 2 contains the word = benediction No.
• Verse 3 is a summary of the "Ḳedushshah" = benediction No.
• Verse 4 explains the knowledge asked for in No.
• Verse 6 accounts for the petition against the enemy, No.
• Verse 7 is the prayer for the exiles, No.
• Verse 8 is the content of the prayer in behalf of the pious, No.
• Verse 9 is the prayer for Jerusalem, No.
• Verse 10 recalls No.
• Verse 11 is clearly related to both Nos. and

Another line begins "Hasten the end-time," which may, by its Messianic implication, suggest benediction No. ("the sprout of David").

If this construction of Ben Sira's prayer is admissible, many of the benedictions must be assigned to the Maccabean era, though most scholars have regardedthem as posterior to the destruction of the Temple. The verse marked 5, indeed, seems to be a commentary on benediction No. It begins with the word , and thus suggests the verse: "Lead us back to Thee and we shall return, renew our days as of yore" (Lamentations 5:21, Hebr.). Instead of for the "judges," Ben Sira prays for the reestablishment of God's "judgments," in open allusion to the Exodus (Exodus 12:12; Numbers 33:4; Ezekiel 25:11, from which verse he borrows the name "Moab" as a designation of the enemy in the prayer). It is probable that the reading of No. as now given is a later reconstruction of a petition with the implications of the Ecclesiasticus paraphrase. This explanation will obviate the many objections raised against the current opinions; e.g., that under Roman or other foreign rule the Jews would hardly have been permitted to cast reflections on the courts of their masters. The Maccabean period seems to furnish adequate background for the national petitions, though the experiences of the Roman war and the subsequent disasters may have heightened the coloring in many details.

Petition Against Enemies.

The history of the petition against enemies may serve to illustrate the development of the several component parts of the "Tefillah" in keeping with provocations and changed conditions. The verses of Ecclesiasticus make it certain that the Syrian oppressors were the first against whom this outcry of the poor, oppressed victims of tyranny was directed. As the Syrians were aided by the apostates, the "zedim," these were also embraced in the imprecatory appeal. The prayer was in fact designated even in later days as , a petition to humiliate the arrogant ("zedim"; Yer. Ber. 2:3, 4:2). A century later the Sadducees furnished the type, hence it came to be designated as the "Birkat ha-Ẓadduḳim" (but "Ẓadduḳim" may in this connection be merely a euphemism for "Minim"; Yer. Ber. 4:3; Ber. 28b). Under Gamaliel II. it was invoked against heretics, traitors, and traducers: the "minim" and the "posh'im," or, as Maimonides reads, the Apiḳoresim (see also his commentary on Sanh. 10:1, and "Yad," Teshubah, 3:6-8). The latter were the freethinkers; the former, the Judæo-Christians. These had brought much trouble into the camp of faithful Israel; they disputed with the Rabbis; even R. Gamaliel had often to controvert them (see "He-Ḥahuẓ," 7:81 et seq.); they involved the Jews in difficulties with the Roman government (Tosef., Ḥul. 2:24); they denounced the Jews to the authorities (hence "minim" and , R. H. 18a; Tos. to Sanh.; 'Olam R.; comp. Joël, "Blicke in die Religionsgeschichte," 1:33 et seq.; Gutmann, in "Monatsschrift," 1898, p. 344).

R. Gamaliel revitalized the prayer originally directed against the Syrians and their sympathizers (so also Loeb, Weiss, and Hoffmann; Elbogen [c. p. 357] rejects this view in favor of the assumption that the original composition of the prayer was due to Gamaliel), his purpose being to test those suspected of being minim (Tan., Wayiḳra, ed. Buber, p. 2a; Yer. Ber. 5:4). The editorship is ascribed to Samuel the Younger (Ber. 28a), who, however, is reported to have forgotten its form the very next year. According to Yer. Ber. 5:3 he merely omitted some part of the prayer; and, as he was not under suspicion of heresy, the omission was overlooked.

Modifications in "Birkat ha-Minim."

The above account seems to suggest that this "new" (revised) addition to the benedictions was not admitted at once and without some opposition. The prayer has undergone since the days of Gamaliel many textual changes, as the variety of versions extant evidences. "Kol Bo" gives the number of the words contained therein as thirty-two, which agrees with none of the extant recensions. The prayer furnished the traducers of Judaism and the Jews a ready weapon of attack (e.g., Wagenseil; see "Sefer Niẓẓaḥon,"p. 348). In the Maḥzor of Salonica it begins with the word La-meshummadim" (see Oraḥ Ḥayyim, 118), as it does in the Roman Maḥzor (see also "Kesef Mishneh, Tefillah," at the beginning of ). "Meshummad" designates a Jew who apostatizes (Ramban on Exodus 12:43 gives an incorrect identification, as does Parḥon, s. ) or is lax in his religious duties ('Er. 69a; Ḥul. 5a; Sanh. 27a; Hor. 11a; Targ. Onḳ. to Exodus 12:43; Mek., Bo, 15; Giṭ. 45a, in the uncensored editions; the censored have "Mumar"). The prayer is not inspired, however, by hatred toward non-Jews; nevertheless, in order to obviate hostile misconstructions, the text was modified. Originally the opening words were "La-zedim ula-minim," and the conclusion had "maknia' zedim" (see "Sefer ha-Eshkol" and "Shibbole ha-Leḳeṭ"). The change of the beginning into "La-meshummadim" is old (Zunz, "G. V." 2d ed., p. 380). Another emendation was "We-la-posh'im" (idem, "Ritus," p. 89), which readily gave way to the colorless "We-la-malshinim" (in the German ritual among others). For "minim" was substituted the expression "all doers of iniquity"; but the Sephardim retained "minim," while Maimonides has "Epicureans." In the older versions the continuation is: "and all the enemies of Thy people," or, in Amram Gaon's "Siddur," "all our enemies"; but this is modified in the German and Roman into "and they all," while Maimonides omits the clause altogether. Finally, there was mention of the "kingdom of arrogance" ("zadon") = the Roman empire. For this Amram presents "the doers of 'zadon,"' which at last was turned into "zedim," thus reverting to the earliest expression. The conclusion is either "who breakest the enemies" (Midr. Teh.) or "humiliates the arrogant" (Amram); in the former phrase Saadia and Maimonides replace the noun "enemies" by "evil-doers."

According to Zunz, the seventh benediction looks like a duplication and is superfluous: at all events it is misplaced. There is some probability that it originally formed part of the liturgy for the fastdays, when 18 + 6 benedictions constituted the "Tefillah" (Ta'an. 2:2); for in specifying the additional benedictions the Mishnah enumerates seven, not six (ib. 2:4). The first of the seven enumerated is identical with the one contained in the "Shemoneh 'Esreh" as No. Most likely when Israel's distress became constant this petition for help was gradually made a part of the daily liturgy.

Method of Recital.

As the prevailing use of the plural shows, the"Shemoneh 'Esreh" was first intended as a prayer in behalf of the congregation, which listened in silence and at certain points bowed with the reader (Tos. to Ber. 1:9). By joining the precentor in reading aloud, one became notorious (ib.). At the conclusion of every benediction the congregants, while in the Temple, said "Amen," probably because the Tetragrammaton was pronounced; the response was "Blessed be the name; the glory of His kingdom [endureth] forever and aye" (Tos. to Ber. 7:22; Ta'an. 16b). Gradually, after R. Gamaliel, it came to be the custom that every man softly read the "Tefillah" for himself, instead of merely listening to the reader's recitation of it; only for one not familiar enough () with the prayer was the older practise held permissible. Then, in order to give the reader time to go over the "Tefillah" first for himself, silent praying by all was allowed to precede the audible recitation by the reader (see Soṭah 40a; Yer. Ber. 1:8). In Babylon this became the rule, but in Palestine the "Tefillah" was read aloud by the congregation (Müller, "Ḥillufim," No. 43; Zunz, "Ritus," p. 83). Formerly the reader would not ascend (or descend to) the rostrum before beginning the loud (second) recital (Elbogen, c. p. 431). Familiarity with the contents and reverential recital of the benedictions was insisted on in a reader (Bacher, in "J. Q. R." 14:586), that those who were ignorant might by listening to him discharge their duty. Maimonides abrogated the repetition of the "Tefillah" (Zunz, c. p. 55) for the congregation at Cairo, though not in his "Yad"(see "Yad," Tefillin, 9:2 et seq.). In the evening service, attendance at which was by some not regarded as obligatory (Weiss, "Dor," 2:76; Ber. 27b), the "Tefillah" was not repeated aloud; and as a rule only eighteen Biblical verses, to take the place of the eighteen benedictions, were read (see L. Loew in "Monatsschrift," 1884, pp. 112 et seq.; "Shibbole ha-Leḳeṭ," ed. Buber, p. 21; SeMaG, command No. 19).

According to "Shibbole ha-Leḳeṭ." (ed. Buber, p. 9), some prefaced the "Tefillah" by the verse Psalms 65:3, while in Constantine "Wehu Raḥum" was recited as an introduction (Zunz, "Ritus," p. 52). At the end, after Mar bar Rabina's "My God keep my tongue" (Ber. 17a), during the Middle Ages was added "do on account of Thy name," etc.; then to this, Psalms 19:15; and, still later, the phrase "He who established peace," etc. ("Shibbole ha-Leḳeṭ," p. 18). In the Roman ritual the "Elohai Neẓor" (Ber. 17a) is missing (Zunz, c. p. 79).

In the Reform liturgies, in benediction No. "go'el" is changed to "ge'ullah" (redemption). In No. the resurrection is replaced by "sustaining in life the whole" and by "redeeming the soul of His servants from death." The prayers for Jerusalem, for the reestablishment of the sacrifices, and for the coming of the Messiah are omitted, as is also the petition against the enemies of Israel (comp. "Protokolle der Zweiten Rabbinerversammlung," pp. 104 et seq., Frankfort-on-the-Main, 1845).